Direct Tax Services
Select Your Location
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) released Circular No. 159/15/2021-GST on September 20, 2021, to clarify scope of intermediary services under the GST regime. This circular is the first step towards resolving the problems that trade and industry are encountering due to differing interpretations of the issue by tax officers.
According to the circular, there have to be certain pre-requisite conditions that must be met before any service can be classified as “intermediary services.” In this blog, we throw light on these conditions as laid down in the circular.
Table of Contents
Due to the ambiguity of the GST law’s interpretation and coverage of ‘intermediary services’, the CBIC has established certain pre-requisites and guiding principles to determine whether a service qualifies as ‘intermediary’ or not. Below is the list of pre-requisites as specified by CBIC:
Each of these conditions is discussed in detail in the below paragraphs:
1. Minimum three parties
The definition of ‘intermediary’ clarifies that an arrangement must have a minimum of three parties, i.e., two parties transacting in the supply of goods, services, or securities (main supply) and one party arranging or facilitating such main supply (ancillary supply).
The party that mediates or facilitates the primary supply of goods or services will be the intermediary. The CBIC clarifies that he does not perform the main supply on his own. As a result, his service is also known as ancillary supply.
Therefore, it can be said that an arrangement involving only two parties is not considered to be an ‘intermediary service.’
2. Two distinct supplies
Intermediary services should always include two distinct supplies, namely the main supply and the ancillary supply of arranging or facilitating the main supply of goods & services between two parties (clearly identifiable and distinguished from the main supply).
As a result, a person involved in the primary supply to another person on a principal-to-principal basis cannot be considered a supplier of intermediary services. In other words, the CBIC clarifies that a principal who performs the primary supply cannot also act as an intermediary in the same transaction.
In the transaction, there must be at least two distinct supplies. While the primary supply occurs between the two principals, the intermediary provides an ancillary supply in the form of the facilitation of goods or services.
3. Character of agent or broker or similar person in the definition and supply on own account
The intermediary must assume the role of an agent or broker. An intermediary is defined by the IGST law as an agent, broker, or any other person who arranges or facilitates supply of goods or services between two or more parties. It excludes goods and services, as well as securities sold on the person’s own account.
What is meant by ‘intermediary’?
The term ‘intermediary’ is defined in section 2 – sub-section (13) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and is replicated below for your understanding.
“A broker, an agent, or any other individual, by whatever name called, who organizes or facilitates the provision of goods, services, or both, or securities, between two or more persons, but does not include person who supplies such goods, services, or both, or securities on his own behalf.”
The section of the definition dealing with the character of the intermediary service provider is not inclusive, but instead uses the expression ‘means’ rather than expanding the definition by using the words ‘and includes’.
As a result, the phrase “arranges or facilitates” denotes a secondary or supporting role played by an intermediary, implying that they do not supply the primary supply on their own. This implies that the service of intermediary is only supportive.
The next point to be clarified was the exclusion of suppliers of goods, services, or securities acting on their own behalf. The term ‘such’ goods, services, or securities is used in the definition. It should be noted that this only refers to the main supply. As a result, if the person supplies directly to the principal, he cannot be considered an intermediary.
The term ‘such’ refers to the primary supply of goods, services, or securities, implying that an intermediary does not include someone who supplies such goods, services, or securities (wholly or partially) on their own account.
4. Exclusion of sub-contracting
A subcontractor, to whom the supply may be entirely or partially outsourced, does not arrange or facilitate the main supply between the primary supplier and their customers, and hence does not qualify as an ‘intermediary’ in GST. Hence, sub-contracting is not considered as an intermediary service in GST.
5. Other aspects which are clarified by CBIC in the Circular
The particular clause on the place of supply of “intermediary services” under section 13 of the Integrated Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (IGST Act) would only be applicable when the supplier or the recipient of intermediary services is located outside of India.
The government, thus, has clarified that services outsourced to India or performed in India for foreign entities will not be considered intermediary services, and thus will not be subject to the 18 % goods and services tax (GST), which is seen as a huge relief for India’s $180 billion technology sector.
The circular also provides a few examples to show that services that are in the form of ancillary supplies such as arranging or facilitating the provision of the main supply of goods & services would be considered as ‘intermediary’ services, but it does not cover services outsourced to a third party, such as outsourcing software development services or outsourcing customer service to a BPO firm.
It has also been clarified that these illustrations given in the Circular are demonstrative and generic in nature, and should not be construed to imply that the service categories or industries mentioned are inherently intermediary or otherwise. To determine the same, the specific facts of the case and the particular terms of the contract should be examined individually.
Back-office service providers, or business process outsourcing (BPO) entities, were being treated as intermediaries by tax authorities, denying the export status of their services to overseas entities. Exports are zero-rated under GST and are not subject to the tax, whereas intermediaries are subject to an 18% charge.
More than 200 companies are involved in legal challenges over the definition of “intermediary” services. The circular specifies the conditions that must be met in order for a service to qualify as intermediary service.
Taking into consideration the pre-requisites as laid down in the Circular, it can be construed that back-office services would be considered exports and not intermediary services.
Hence, the circular on the scope of intermediary services is welcome news for the BPO, IT, and ITES industries, as it establishes tests and parameters for distinguishing sub-contracting and outsourcing arrangements from those of intermediary services.
These principles are expected to resolve pending litigations and also the ambiguity created by conflicting advance rulings.
The revenue authorities have also accepted that the GST law’s definition of intermediary is comparable to the definition given under the service tax law and that the jurisprudence put in place in the service tax context would be useful and can be leveraged by the industry.
In fact, it is the second GST Circular on the subject, the first of which was issued in December 2018. The term “intermediary” was adapted from the previous Service Tax legislation. Except for one point, there is little difference in this definition between the GST and Service Tax laws. As defined by the GST law, the supply of securities is also a part of the intermediary.
According to the circular, an intermediary is a person or entity who arranges or facilitates supply of goods, services, or securities between two or more parties. As a result, an intermediary arrangement must include at least three parties. The intermediary arrangement must also include two distinct supplies, one provided by the two contracting entities (main supply) and one provided by the intermediary (ancillary supply). An intermediary service provider must have the persona of an agent, broker, or something similar. Furthermore, anyone supplying goods, services, or both, or securities on his own behalf is not an intermediary. Even sub-contracting for a service would not be deemed as intermediary service. This clarification will free up a large amount of money that has been held up in tax refunds by GST authorities for entities engaged in ITES, R&D, financial, and counting services, as well as benefit the BPO sector, which operates on a very thin margin in a highly competitive business environment.
Read our article:Is blocking of ITC by the GST Department legal – Rule 86A?
Ashish M. Shaji has done his graduation in law (BA. LLB) from CCS University. He has keen interests in doing extensive research and writing on legal subjects especially on corporate law. He is a creative thinker and has a great interest in exploring legal subjects.
The Reserve Bank of India, in its press release dated June 8, 2023, issued Statement on Develop...
RBI released a developmental and regulatory policy statement on June 8, 2023. The objective of...
Financial Institutions called Asset Reconstruction Companies ("ARCs") reconstruct and securitis...
Any person booked for an offence under the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPc) / the Code would be r...
The Reserve Bank of India regulates Non-Banking Financial Companies in India, and they are subj...
The Reserve Bank of India regulates Non-banking Financial Companies in accordance with the RBI...
Incorporation of a Limited Liability Company (LLC) is an attractive choice for small business o...
The Reserve Bank of India (the Bank) issued Non-Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of Publi...
A few years ago, investing in traditional investment categories like shares, bonds, real estate...
Compared to other organisations, the corporate governance of Non-Banking Financial Companies is...
Are you human?: 9 + 1 =
Easy Payment Options Available No Spam. No Sharing. 100% Confidentiality
In India, several talks and discussions on “GST Implementation” began back from the year 2000. And finally, aft...
04 Sep, 2017
Instances of fake GST registration have been reported in the last few months. The modus operandi for this involves...
16 May, 2022
Red Herring Top 100 Asia enlists outstanding entrepreneurs and promising companies. It selects the award winners from approximately 2000 privately financed companies each year in the Asia. Since 1996, Red Herring has kept tabs on these up-and-comers. Red Herring editors were among the first to recognize that companies such as Google, Facebook, Kakao, Alibaba, Twitter, Rakuten, Salesforce.com, Xiaomi and YouTube would change the way we live and work.
Researchers have found out that organization using new technologies in their accounting and tax have better productivity as compared to those using the traditional methods. Complying with the recent technological trends in the accounting industry, Enterslice was formed to focus on the emerging start up companies and bring innovation in their traditional Chartered Accountants & Legal profession services, disrupt traditional Chartered Accountants practice mechanism & Lawyers.
Stay updated with all the latest legal updates. Just enter your email address and subscribe for free!
Chat on Whatsapp
Hey I'm Suman. Let's Talk!