Direct Tax Services
Select Your Location
In furtherance of the efforts to combat the pandemic, the corporate sector deployed their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) funds to make available medicines, stretchers, medical supplies etc. Though these contributions were made from the CSR funds, the confusion has been lurking over the applicability of GST on supplies under CSR activities. Whether the companies can claim ITC on the supplies made under CSR activities or not?
Table of Contents
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) are the voluntary contribution made by companies falling under a certain category in the form of projects and programmes with the aim of making a better society and providing a cleaner environment to the public. As the name suggests, the corporates have a responsibility towards the society for sharing profits earned from the society with the society itself in the form of projects and programmes for making a society a better place.
Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that every eligible company has to spend the average of the net profits for the preceding three financial years towards the CSR initiatives. Sub-section (1) of section 135 of the Companies Act provides the criteria for those companies who are having:
in the preceding financial year to meet the CSR requirements under the Act.
Following is list of activities in which these funds can be deployed by the eligible companies under CSR initiatives:
One view: No Input Tax Credit available on supplies under GST
Before examining availability of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on CSR activities, let us first understand the meaning of some of the important definitions under GST:
Having looked at the ITC provisions under section 17(2) of Central Goods and Services Act, it can be seen that taxes are paid on the inputs that can be claimed as ITC only of the outputs are taxable supplies. Further, section 17(5) ITC is not made available for goods that have been stolen, lost, written off, disposed of by way of gifts or free samples, destroyed.
In the case of CSR activities, a company is providing output services free of cost and not for monetary benefit. Having taking into consideration the definitions of taxable suppliesand the provision of section 17(2), it can be concluded that input tax credit cannot be availed on CSR activities.
Further, the provision of section 37 of the Income Tax Act clearly explains that any expenditure which is incurred with regards to the CSR activities cannot be deemed by the assessee for profession or business. Thus, such expenditure cannot be claimed as business expenditure. This leads to a possible conclusion that since the transaction cannot be claimed as business expenditure, therefore, ITC cannot be claimed on such spending.
AAR on: No Input Tax Credit available on supplies under GST
In the case of Polycab Wires Pvt. Ltd., the company had distributed electrical goods to the people who were affected by flood in Kerala as part of its CSR activities. The Kerala bench of Authority of Advanced Ruling held that the company had distributed the electrical appliances free of cost as part of CSR activity and therefore ITC cannot be claimed for his purpose under section 17(5) of the Kerala State Goods and Services Act and CGST Act. Here, the provision of section 17(5) was invoked to deny ITC on goods distributed under the obligations of the CSR activities.
The Gujarat Bench of Authority of Advanced Rulings (AAR) also held that CSR activities under Companies (CSR Policy) Rules have been excluded from the normal course of business. This ruling came from the authority where the applicant is a private limited company. The AAR said the private Company is not eligible to claim ITC in GST on supplies under CSR.
The company involved in the above ruling was a supplier of insecticides, pesticide and fungicides. This company expended its CSR expenditure in providing course material and stationery for schools, providing tables and chairs in hospitals and schools, building concrete benches in public parks, installing oxygen concentrators at hospitals, distributing masks, sanitizers and oxygen concentrators.
The company submitted before the bench that since the CSR are mandatory, the expenses made by the company is made in furtherance of fulfilling that mandate and in the course of business. Therefore, expenses made on such supply should be made eligible for claiming ITC.
The Gujarat AAR did not agree to the submissions made by the company and took an opposite view. The Gujarat AAR went ahead and pointed out the fact that it is not bound by the ruling given by UP bench of AAR. It further added that AAR rulings are binding only on the applicant and the relevant GST official.
If this ruling is accepted and followed by the GST authorities at the time of assessment, then it will become a big problem for the India Inc. which had in the backdrop of pandemic heavily spent on CSR activities such as providing medicines, oxygen concentrators, sanitizers, ventilators etc.
Another view: Input Tax Credit is available on supplies under GST
There is another view which allows applicability of GST on supplies under CSR activities since these expenses are incurred in furtherance or in course of the business. Undertaking CSR activities have been made compulsory under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and it also has a positive impact on the image of a company. It creates a goodwill and enhances the reputation of a company. Therefore, it can be concluded that CSR activities are incurred in furtherance or course of business and hence ITC can be claimed by virtue of this.
AAR on: Input Tax Credit is available on supplies under GST
In the case of Essel Propack Limited v Comm. Of CGST- Mumbai CESTAT held that ITC can be claimed for all the expenditure which is incurred on the CSR activities. The Tribunal was of the opinion that CSR activities improved the image of the company and thus they can be considered as activities relating to the business.
A divergent view was taken regarding GST on supplies under CSR by two different benches of the same AAR. The Uttar Pradesh bench came out with an advanced ruling in the case of Dwarikesh Sugar Industries. The bench held in this ruling that CSR expenditure is done by the company just for the purpose complying with the obligations imposed by the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the GST on the supplies under CSR incurred by the company on the products which it purchased in furtherance of its CSR expenditure can be set off against its GST liability.
The Companies Act, 2013 does not provide any clarity whether the contribution towards GST have to be made inclusive or exclusive of taxes. It is pretty much clear that GST is charged on supply of goods and services regardless of the intention behind such supply or the social benefit to be achieved from such supply so the CSR contribution can be both inclusive and exclusive of GST. The confusion still persist on the inclusivity of the amount of GST paid in furtherance of CSR expenditure for the purpose of Section 135(5) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Usually a company contributes an amount towards a beneficial organisation such as Section 8 companies, charitable trusts, Non-Government Organisation (NGOs) [“implementing agencies”] for the purpose of fulfilment of CSR activities. However, in order to run their day to day operations and also in the fulfilment of their objectives, they need to hire certain services of vendors to complete these activities. Then these vendors charge GST for the services rendered by them to these implementing agencies. Since, these implementing agencies do not generate output by themselves, the question then pops up whether these implementing agencies can claim ITC for the services rendered by them.
Rule 33 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 provides the concept of ‘pure agent’. Pure agent has been defined under the rules as one who while making a supply to a recipient also receives and incurs expenditure on some other supply on behalf of the recipient and claims reimbursement (as actual, without adding to it the value of his own supply) for such supplies from the recipient of the main supply.
The implementing agencies by their way of functioning fulfil the eligibility criteria of pure agent. Rule 33 also provides some conditions on fulfilment of which the expenses incurred by the supplier as a pure agent of the recipient of the supplier of goods and services are excluded from the value of supply –
In the given situation, if an implementing agency avails any goods or services from a vendor to fulfil the CSR obligations for a company, then the payment made to any such implementing agency shall be construed as a supply made as a pure agent made by the implementing agency on behalf of the recipient of supply i.e. the other company. Therefore, these expenses made by the implementing agencies are excluded from the value of the supply and hence not liable for payment of GST.
In order to bring an end to this confusion and divergent views being taken by different AAR benches, it is necessary that the government comes out a clarification on GST on supplies under CSR allowing ITC on CSR initiatives. If these companies are not allowed to claim ITC on their CSR initiatives, then it will pose a big burden on them. Another question to be resolved is the calculation of the amount of CSR expenditure with respect to the inclusivity or exclusivity of GST imposed on it.
Read our Article:Problems in availing of ITC under GST
Prabhat has done his BA LLB (Hons) and has been writing research papers since his law school days. His interest in content writing made him pursue a career in legal research and content writing. His core areas of interest are indirect taxes, finance and real estate.
Many investors use fixed deposits as their primary investment vehicle. Investors with a high-ri...
The main idea of CDS, which was initially to give banks a way to transfer credit exposure, has...
Black money has been the subject of heated political debate in India for a long time. Successiv...
The Apex Court pronounced a judgement in the case titled Tata Motors Vs The Brihan Mumbai Elect...
Since economies are moving towards digitalisation and making it feasible to conduct transaction...
The Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) Pro-rata and Pari-Passu Rights Proposal Consultation Pa...
The Financial Action Task Force, i.e. FATF (the Force), is the global money laundering and terr...
Advance tax refers to the payment of the tax liability before the end of the relevant financia...
On 11.12.15, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court (HC) pronounced a landmark judgement in the case ti...
Money laundering can be defined as the process of illegal concealment of the origin of money ob...
Are you human?: 7 + 6 =
Easy Payment Options Available No Spam. No Sharing. 100% Confidentiality
GST (Goods and Service Tax) has emerged as a lightning reform in the Indian Tax history. It is an indirect tax impo...
22 Oct, 2019
The Indian government decided to launch GST with many objectives like simplification and bringing order in Indirect...
13 Jul, 2017
Red Herring Top 100 Asia enlists outstanding entrepreneurs and promising companies. It selects the award winners from approximately 2000 privately financed companies each year in the Asia. Since 1996, Red Herring has kept tabs on these up-and-comers. Red Herring editors were among the first to recognize that companies such as Google, Facebook, Kakao, Alibaba, Twitter, Rakuten, Salesforce.com, Xiaomi and YouTube would change the way we live and work.
Researchers have found out that organization using new technologies in their accounting and tax have better productivity as compared to those using the traditional methods. Complying with the recent technological trends in the accounting industry, Enterslice was formed to focus on the emerging start up companies and bring innovation in their traditional Chartered Accountants & Legal profession services, disrupt traditional Chartered Accountants practice mechanism & Lawyers.
Stay updated with all the latest legal updates. Just enter your email address and subscribe for free!
Chat on Whatsapp
Hey I'm Suman. Let's Talk!