Direct Tax
Consulting
ESG Advisory
Indirect Tax
Growth Advisory
Internal Audit
BFSI Audit
Industry Audit
Valuation
RBI Services
SEBI Services
IRDA Registration
AML Advisory
IBC Services
Recovery of Shares
NBFC Compliance
IRDA Compliance
Finance & Accounts
Payroll Compliance Services
HR Outsourcing
LPO
Fractional CFO
General Legal
Corporate Law
Debt Recovery
Select Your Location
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has approved several important regulatory changes in its 2026 Board meeting. These changes make compliance easier for market participants while maintaining market integrity, investor protection, and governance standards.
The new measures will impact various market segments such as Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs), Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs), Social Impact Funds, REITs, and InvITs. The ‘fit and proper’ criteria for market intermediaries have also been changed. SEBI has also tightened the conflict-of-interest framework for its board members and officials.
However, not all changes become effective immediately after board approval. In many cases, regulatory amendments, Gazette notifications, circulars, or operational guidelines will be required. Therefore, the entities concerned will have to keep an eye on the final notification.
SEBI’s recent decisions suggest that the regulator is trying to reduce the compliance burden on one hand while strengthening accountability on the other.
These changes are now mainly for board-level approvals. The exact requirements of each measure will be clarified only after the relevant regulatory amendments, and implementation directions are issued.
In the case of Alternative Investment Funds or AIFs, some liabilities may remain even after the end of the fund’s life, such as tax demands, pending litigation, regulatory matters, or final operational expenses. So, the fund may have to hold onto the money for some time even after the end of the investment activity.
In the previous regime, this situation could have been quite difficult for AIF managers from a AIF compliance perspective. It is not always easy to complete the entire winding-up process due to unresolved liabilities even after the end of the investment period of the fund.
SEBI has now decided to allow the retention of liquidation proceeds even after the end of the fund’s life in certain circumstances. So, the need to keep the fund in an active state unnecessarily to meet genuine pending liabilities may be reduced.
Retention of Liquidation Proceeds
The new framework mainly considers a few situations. These include:
However, this does not allow the AIF to freely retain investor money. There will need to be proper reasons and supporting documents for the retained amount. The money cannot be retained just because the fund’s life has ended.
The “Inoperative Fund” Concept
SEBI has approved the introduction of another “inoperative fund” concept. An AIF whose active fund-management activity has ended, but registration cannot be surrendered due to some unresolved matter, can come under this category. This will create an opportunity to reduce some recurring compliance requirements.
AIF managers need to look at a few things now:
This can make the fund closure process more organized and reduce the compliance burden at the end.
Another important decision of SEBI for Foreign Portfolio Investors or FPIs is to allow fund settlement for eligible outright cash-market transactions.
Currently, under gross settlement, the fund’s obligations for purchase and sale transactions have to be managed separately. This can create a large temporary funding requirement. Fund blockage and foreign exchange-related costs can also increase. The new system aims to make this process more efficient.
The new changes-
If an FPI buys Stock A worth ₹100 crore and sells Stock B worth ₹100 crore in the same settlement cycle.
In case of gross settlement, the FPI will have to arrange funds for the purchase obligation of ₹100 crore and deliver Stock B separately.
In case of net settlement, the purchase and sale obligations of eligible transactions can be adjusted. So, if the buy and sell amounts are the same, temporary fund blockage of large amounts can be reduced.
Its importance-
This change can have several practical benefits:
There may be special advantages during index rebalancing, when FPIs can buy and sell securities in large amounts at the same time.
Important Limitations
The new facility should not be seen as a netting mechanism for the entire settlement system. It will apply to certain eligible outright cash-market transactions.
Some important points are:
As per the approved framework of SEBI, the facility is targeted to be implemented by 31 December 2026. However, the final operational process, system requirements, and eligibility conditions will be clarified through relevant circulars or guidelines.
So, it is important for FPIs and their custodians to review the settlement systems, reconciliation processes, and treasury arrangements.
SEBI has approved a reduction in the minimum investment for individual investors from ₹2 lakh to ₹1,000 in Social Impact Funds. Social Impact Funds are linked to the AIF framework and the Social Stock Exchange ecosystem. They raise capital for social sector projects and enterprises.
The lower minimum amount will allow more individual investors to access this type of investment. This can increase participation in social finance. However, a lower entry amount does not reduce investment risk. Investors need to be clear about liquidity, returns, and product structure. Therefore, simple disclosure and responsible communication are very important for fund managers.
More Operational Flexibility for REITs and InvITs
SEBI has approved some operational flexibility for REITs and InvITs. This handles practical issues like project completion, SPV management, temporary investments, and borrowings easily.
Continued Holding of SPVs by InvITs
There may still be some work remaining in the Special Purpose Vehicle, or SPV, even after the concession period of an infrastructure project ends, such as pending claims, litigation, tax matters, or defect-liability obligations. In such a situation, exiting the SPV immediately is not always practical.
The new framework will allow InvITs to hold the SPV even after project completion if certain conditions are met. However, this holding will not be for an indefinite period. InvITs will have to exit the SPV within the specified period or use it for a new eligible infrastructure project.
Wider Temporary Investment Options
Some flexibility has also been added for holding temporary funds of REITs and InvITs. The increased investment opportunities in eligible liquid mutual fund schemes help to manage temporary surplus funds.
However, it is important to adhere to credit quality, liquidity, and your own investment policy while investing.
Greenfield Projects and Borrowing Flexibility
SEBI has also approved some other changes, which include:
These changes may give REITs and InvITs some more operational space in project and fund management. However, proper monitoring of leverage and investment limits is still important.
Revised Fit-and-Proper Criteria for Market Intermediaries
SEBI has also made changes to the fit-and-proper criteria for market intermediaries. These criteria are used to judge factors such as the integrity, honesty, reputation, and ethical conduct of an individual or entity.
FIR or chargesheet will not automatically disqualify an Applicant
In the new approach, a person will not be automatically disqualified just because an FIR or chargesheet has been filed. The matter will be assessed on a principles-based approach, looking at the facts and circumstances.
This is important because an FIR or chargesheet itself does not prove the guilt of a person. However, this does not mean that regulatory scrutiny is decreasing. Rather, relevant facts, conduct, integrity, and overall record will become more important.
Stronger Standards and Due Process
The revised framework has clarified the standards in some areas:
Market intermediaries should keep their compliance records updated regularly. Litigation, regulatory proceedings, and corrective actions need to be properly documented.
Compliance teams should also re-examine the fit-and-proper review process. Accurate disclosure and timely reporting will be important, especially for key managerial personnel and persons in control.
SEBI has approved strengthening its conflict-of-interest and ethics framework for its board members and officials. The changes have been made based on recommendations by a high-level committee.
This ensures greater transparency, accountability, and proper conflict management in regulatory decision-making.
Under the new framework, the investment and disclosure requirements of the SEBI Chairperson and Whole-Time Members will be stricter. Specific restrictions and reporting requirements will apply to their personal investments.
Recusal will play an important role for conflict. If an official’s personal interest is involved in a regulatory matter, then there will be a mechanism for him to recuse himself.
It has also been approved to create a digital conflict-management system. It helps to identify conflicts, keep records, and track recusal.
In addition, a whistleblower mechanism and an Office of Ethics and Compliance have also been created. So, an attempt has been made to further organize conflict management in SEBI’s own internal governance structure.
What These Changes Mean for Regulated Entities?
According to the new changes by SEBI, regulated entities will have to be aware of the new rules and review their existing compliance processes.
For AIFs
For FPIs
For Intermediaries
For REITs and InvITs
When SEBI regulations change, compliance cannot be ensured by just reading the notification. Businesses need to understand how the new rules will impact their existing structure, documents and internal processes. Here, Enterslice can provide compliance support.
Our Services:
Not every business has the same regulatory requirements. So, it is more important to identify the required compliance areas by the existing setup. Enterslice can help businesses understand these changes and align their compliance process as per the applicable requirements.
To Wrap Up
SEBI’s recent regulatory change is to create some operational flexibility for market participants while maintaining regulatory oversight. For AIFs, FPIs, intermediaries, REITs and InvITs, the changes may have a practical impact on the compliance process.
However, board approval is not the final step. It is important to keep an eye on final regulations, Gazette notifications, circulars and implementation guidelines. Enterslice can provide businesses with the necessary regulatory support to update internal processes and understand compliance requirements with these changes. So, connect with us today and make your compliance super easy.
SEBI has approved several changes to AIFs, FPIs, Social Impact Funds, REITs, InvITs, market intermediaries, and its own internal governance framework. These include greater flexibility in AIF winding-up, net settlement for eligible FPI cash-market transactions, a lower investment threshold for Social Impact Funds, and revised fit-and-proper criteria. Conflict-of-interest and disclosure requirements for SEBI officials have also been tightened.
SEBI has made provisions to allow AIFs to retain liquidation proceeds even after the end of fund life in certain circumstances. These may include tax, litigation, regulatory, and some operational liabilities. The concept of an inoperative fund has also been introduced. This will help reduce some recurring compliance for AIFs that have ceased active fund-management but are yet to surrender their registration.
An inoperative fund is an AIF that has ceased active fund-management activity but still has some unresolved obligations or retained proceeds. In this situation, fulfilling certain conditions may reduce some of the recurring compliance requirements. However, the AIF manager will have to comply with the prescribed conditions and maintain the necessary records and documents properly.
SEBI has approved net settlement of funds for outright cash-market transactions of eligible FPIs. Instead of arranging the entire purchase amount separately for qualifying buy and sell transactions, settlement can be done as per the net fund requirement. This can reduce temporary capital blockage and funding cost. However, the settlement of securities will still be as per the applicable settlement mechanism.
FPIs can buy and sell many securities at once during index rebalancing. Even if there are sale proceeds in the gross funding system, it may be necessary to arrange a large amount separately. Net settlement can reduce this temporary funding requirement. So, treasury management can be easier, and related funding costs and operational friction can be reduced to some extent.
SEBI has approved the reduction of the minimum investment for individual investors in Social Impact Funds from ₹2 lakh to ₹1,000. So, the opportunity for small investors to participate in such funds may increase. However, it is important to understand the fund structure, risk, liquidity, and applicable disclosures well before investing. A lower minimum investment does not necessarily mean lower investment risk.
SEBI has approved a number of operational flexibilities for REITs and InvITs. These include retention of SPVs of InvITs after project completion in certain circumstances, more options for temporary investment, and limited greenfield project investment for privately listed InvITs. Borrowing flexibility has also been increased in some cases. These changes can help in managing project management, treasury, and financing requirements.
No, an FIR or chargesheet is filed does not automatically disqualify a market intermediary. The revised framework states that the matter should be considered after considering the relevant facts and circumstances. Matters like integrity, honesty, reputation, and ethical conduct will also be looked at. However, convictions under economic offences or securities laws are still a significant factor in the fit-and-proper assessment and may lead to disqualification in certain cases.
SEBI has tightened the conflict-of-interest framework for its members and officials. It includes investment restrictions, disclosures, conflict identification, and recusal requirements. A digital conflict-management system, whistleblower mechanism, and Office of Ethics and Compliance have also been put in place. Investment and transparency requirements for chairpersons and full-time members have been tightened so that potential conflicts can be better identified and managed.
No, not all changes become effective on the same day after board approval. Some reforms may require amending regulations, issuing Gazette notifications, issuing circulars or implementation guidelines, and making system changes. Therefore, regulated entities should look at the Board approval and actual effective date separately. The compliance process should be modified after reviewing subsequent notifications and directions of SEBI.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has approved several important regulatory cha...
SEBI has taken a major step to make compliance reporting easier in the Indian securities market...
India's digital payment system is growing rapidly. Now, many businesses are getting involved in...
AI is becoming an important part of banking, payments, securities markets, and financial servic...
The RBI has brought a change in the concentration of risk norms for NBFCs involved in infrastru...
Are you human?: 6 + 8 =
Easy Payment Options Available No Spam. No Sharing. 100% Confidentiality
To provide relief to the FPI (Foreign Portfolio Investor), SEBI came out with the revised KYC norms for FPIs &...
25 Jun, 2023
Digital platforms have changed the way we gain access to information. Sadly, finance information has also reached a...
21 Sep, 2024