Direct Tax Services
Audit
Consulting
ESG Advisory
RBI Services
SEBI Services
IRDA Registration
FEMA Advisory
Compliances
IBC Services
VCFO Services
Developed
Developing
BOTs
American
EU-1
EU-2
South East
South Asia
Gulf
ME
Select Your Location
Virtual Currencies (VCs) have been popular among Indians. Before regulatory restrictions were imposed, a number of traders in India were dealing with Virtual Currencies (VC). The single regulation on virtual currency is a circular issued by the Reserve Bank of India. It restricts the use of regulated banking and payment channels for selling and purchasing VC.
Table of Contents
A Virtual Currency is a form of digital currency that represents a value and is issued by private developers and is denominated in their own unit of account. The concept of virtual currency covers a number of “Currencies” ranging from simple IOUs of issuers to virtual currencies backed by assets like gold and cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin etc.
Certain VCs can be converted into fiat currency while others can’t, and as such, the latter’s use for payment is limited. VC does not have the status of legal tender. A legal tender is guaranteed by the Central Government, and everyone is bound to accept it as a mode of payment.
As stated earlier, a single regulation on VC is circular. The VC circular has been challenged in the court of law (Supreme Court) on constitutional grounds. Before issuing the VC circular, the RBI had warned about the risks associated with VCs, including money laundering, consumer protection, cybersecurity, and volatility. It shows that government authorities like RBI have significant reservations about the usage of VCs in India.
Last year in the month of July, an Inter-Ministerial Committee formed by the Ministry of Finance released a report on the proposed regulatory approach on distributed ledger technology and VCs. The committee recommended a complete prohibition on dealing with VCs along with criminal penalties. It also urged the promotion of distributed ledger technology without VCs’ use and the exploration of sovereign digital currency. The recommendation of the committee is non-binding, and it is under consideration of the government.
At present, there is no express law that defines VCs as a service, security, commodity, or currency. The categorization of it into at least one of these classes is essential as the existing law applies differently based on the categorization.
The Inter-Ministerial Committee observed that cryptocurrencies cannot replace conventional or traditional currencies as there are a number of issues with them.
Some of them are as follows:
The VCs are prone to hit all-time highs and also likely to hit all-time lows. In such an incident, the value of Bitcoin reduced from 20,000 US Dollars in December 2017 to 3800 US Dollars in November 2018.
Virtual Currencies like cryptocurrencies are decentralized; therefore, they are difficult to be regulated. This poses a considerable challenge to government regulatory authorities.
The design of VCs has certain vulnerabilities that pose a risk to consumers. The consumers can be subjected to cyberattacks and Ponzi schemes. These cyberattacks can cause a massive loss to consumers. Moreover, the transactions are irreversible, which means there is no way to redress wrong transactions.
It requires a large amount of storage and processing power. It can have unfavorable consequences on the energy resources of the country.
It provides significant anonymity that makes it vulnerable to high risk of money laundering as well as terrorist financing activities.
Different regulatory frameworks are followed for VCs in different parts of the world. Countries like Japan, Switzerland, Thailand, etc. allow the use of VCs as a mode of payment, whereas in contrast, China has completely banned the use of VCs. As such, no country has fully allowed the use of any virtual currency as a legal tender.
VCs also pose a challenge to regulators around the world. Although the crypto assets can improve the efficiency and the inclusiveness of the financial system, they pose a challenge to both customers as well as to the regulators all around the world. Some of the regulators in the world have devised policies to address the risk posed by VCs, while many of them have imposed a blanket ban on it.
Some countries treat VCs as commodities, while others consider them to fiat money. Various nations have taken different approaches to taxation of VCs.
The RBI has the following power with respect to regulation of VCs:
As per the ruling of the Apex Court (SC), the powers of the RBI would compel it to naturally address all issues that pose a potential risk to the financial system of the country, including the VCs.
There is a possibility that a new law may be formulated on VCs in the future. There is also a possibility that the Reserve Bank of India may find another way out to tackle the trading of VCs. These are all assumptions based on the current situation, but no one knows what the future holds; therefore, it is critical that the regulator has a flexible approach given the rapidly evolving nature of VCs.
With disruptive technologies, balanced regulation is essential to mitigate the risk and promote the benefits. One can hope that the government recognizes this fact and adopts a refined framework for this.
Also, read: Supreme Court Lifts RBI Ban on Cryptocurrency Trading: Bitcoin Legal in India
Ashish M. Shaji has done his graduation in law (BA. LLB) from CCS University. He has keen interests in doing extensive research and writing on legal subjects especially on corporate law. He is a creative thinker and has a great interest in exploring legal subjects.
The Reserve Bank of India regulates Non-Banking Financial Companies in India, and they are subj...
The Reserve Bank of India regulates Non-banking Financial Companies in accordance with the RBI...
Incorporation of a Limited Liability Company (LLC) is an attractive choice for small business o...
The Reserve Bank of India (the Bank) issued Non-Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of Publi...
A few years ago, investing in traditional investment categories like shares, bonds, real estate...
Compared to other organisations, the corporate governance of Non-Banking Financial Companies is...
India is emerging as a global powerhouse. India is a huge market and is witnessing rapid econom...
The main objective of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002, i.e. PMLA (the Act), is curb...
On 5th June 2018, the Special Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi, in the case tit...
One of the major driving forces for the development of the Indian economy is NBFC. Due to its c...
Are you human?: 2 + 6 =
Easy Payment Options Available No Spam. No Sharing. 100% Confidentiality
When the Reserve Bank of India banned banks of India from processing payments related to cryptocurrency two years a...
16 Sep, 2020
The world is moving at a fast pace today, and your enterprise also needs to keep up with this pace. In today's worl...
22 Jul, 2020
Red Herring Top 100 Asia enlists outstanding entrepreneurs and promising companies. It selects the award winners from approximately 2000 privately financed companies each year in the Asia. Since 1996, Red Herring has kept tabs on these up-and-comers. Red Herring editors were among the first to recognize that companies such as Google, Facebook, Kakao, Alibaba, Twitter, Rakuten, Salesforce.com, Xiaomi and YouTube would change the way we live and work.
Researchers have found out that organization using new technologies in their accounting and tax have better productivity as compared to those using the traditional methods. Complying with the recent technological trends in the accounting industry, Enterslice was formed to focus on the emerging start up companies and bring innovation in their traditional Chartered Accountants & Legal profession services, disrupt traditional Chartered Accountants practice mechanism & Lawyers.
Stay updated with all the latest legal updates. Just enter your email address and subscribe for free!
Chat on Whatsapp
Hey I'm Suman. Let's Talk!