Direct Tax
Consulting
ESG Advisory
Indirect Tax
Growth Advisory
Internal Audit
BFSI Audit
Industry Audit
Valuation
RBI Services
SEBI Services
IRDA Registration
AML Advisory
IBC Services
Recovery of Shares
NBFC Compliance
IRDA Compliance
Finance & Accounts
Payroll Compliance Services
HR Outsourcing
LPO
Fractional CFO
General Legal
Corporate Law
Debt Recovery
Select Your Location
Dividend refers to the return earned by the shareholder for investing in a company by purchasing its shares. It can be a reward, cash, etc., that a company provides to its shareholders. It can be issued in different forms. The company’s dividend is decided by the board of directors of such a company and warrants the shareholders’ approval. Hence, a dividend is some part of the profit that the company provides to its shareholders. However, there is another category which is known as Deemed Dividends. The Income Tax Act contains various provisions relating to it. This article will discuss the meaning, taxability, and certain case laws relating to deemed dividend under Income Tax Act.
The deemed dividend is an asset given to a shareholder who enjoys a significant share in the company. In simple words, a specific amount loaned or given in advance to a shareholder with a significant share in the company is termed a Deemed Dividend.
As per Section 2(22) (e) of the Income Tax Act, such payments are considered to be deemed dividend when a closely held company provides-
Note– The advancement of the aforesaid loans or advances must be made during the year under consideration, and the loan amount or the advances should come only from the company’s accumulated profits. Moreover, the companies providing such loans should not be listed on the stock exchange.
There are certain transactions that may appear to be part of the deemed dividend under Income Tax but are not treated as deemed dividends. Such transactions are termed as exceptions to the deemed dividend.
Following are the types of transactions which are a few exceptions in this regard: –
Before 2018, companies that paid deemed dividends did not pay any Dividend Distribution Tax on those payments. In Budget 2018, an amendment was introduced to Section 115-O of the Income Tax Act. It mandated the companies to pay Dividend Distribution Tax at the rate of 30% with an applicable surcharge and cess on transactions carried out after April 1, 2018.
This amendment was introduced owing to the fact that the taxability of deemed dividends in the hands of the recipient made tax collection from the shareholder arduous.
Due to this, the shareholder does not have to pay taxes on such receipts.
In the 2021 Budget, the liability to pay tax on dividends was transferred to the shareholders. The companies are no longer liable to pay the Dividend Distribution Tax while providing dividends to the shareholders.
As per Section 194 of the IT Act, which applies to distributed dividends, declared dividends, or dividends paid on or after April 1, 2020, an Indian entity is required to deduct tax at the rate of 10% from the dividends given to the resident shareholders or investors in the case where the total distributed dividend amount or the dividend paid to a shareholder in the financial year is more than 5000 rupees.
The government had reduced the TDS rate for dividend distribution as a covid-19 relief measure. However, no TDS could be deducted from the dividend amount that is paid or payable, or that is due to the insurance entities such as the Life Insurance Corporation, General Insurance Corporation, or other insurers pertaining to any shares held or owned by them.
However, in the case where the dividend is provided to a non-resident or a foreign company, then the tax has to be withheld as per the applicable DTAA under Section 195 of the IT Act 1961.
Section 10(34) exempting stockholders from dividend income stands repealed from AY 2021-22. It shall no longer be applicable to taxpayers. Resultantly, the dividends distributed after the financial year 2020-2021 will be taxable in the hands of the shareholders. This shall also include the dividends paid during the year 2020-21.
Moreover, the applicability of Section 115BBDA, which imposes a tax on the payment of dividends in excess of 10 lakh rupees, is not relevant because the entire pay-out amount shall be taxable in the hands of the investors in accordance with their tax rates.
Therefore, the taxability of the dividend income and the rate of taxation shall be impacted by various factors, including the residential status of an investor and the category of the income, etc. Further, the terms and conditions of the DTAAs and the Multilateral Instruments shall be applicable in the case of a foreign shareholder or non-resident.
The compliance to be followed by the closely held company includes-
The compliance to be followed by the taxpayers includes-
Below we have discussed a few case laws relating to a deemed dividend under the income tax act.
CIT, Andhra Pradesh v CP Sarathy Mudaliar
In the case of CIT, Andhra Pradesh v CP Sarathy Mudaliar, the Apex Court was approached by the litigants to interpret the word dividend. The word dividend has been explained under the Income Tax Act.
In the facts of the instant case, a company had provided a loan to HUF. The members of HUF were the company’s shareholders. Now the Court had to decide whether the loan advanced to HUF, not being a registered shareholder of the company, can be called a dividend.
The Court held that since the definition of dividend didn’t use the phrase, beneficial shareholder, it must be understood as only a registered shareholder. The Court observed that as the HUF is not and can’t be a registered shareholder of the company, the loan advanced to the HUF by the company cannot be termed as a dividend.
CIT v. Madhur Housing and Development Company
In this case, the Supreme Court, while dealing with a batch of appeals, held that the provisions of deemed dividends under the Income Tax Act won’t be attracted if the person availing the loan is not a shareholder of the lender company.
The Court upheld the ruling of the Delhi High Court in the case of Ankitech. It affirmed the Delhi High Court’s reasoning without sharing additional inputs.
In the case of CIT v. Ankitech, the taxpayer company obtained some amount as advances from another company. The shareholders with a substantial interest in the taxpayer company also held voting power exceeding 10% in the other company. Considering that the shareholders holding a substantial interest in the taxpayer company also had a substantial interest in the other company, the tax authorities held that the amount of loans and advances shall be construed as deemed dividends.
On an appeal, this decision was reversed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal also clarified that the dividends can be taxed in the hands of the shareholders having a substantial interest in the taxpayer company.
The High Court noted that the legislature intended to tax deemed dividends in the hands of the shareholders of the lending company having substantial interest.
The tax authorities sought to rely on a circular dated September 22, 1997, which said that deemed dividends shall be taxed in the hands of the borrower. However, the Court rejected the claim.
It was held that deemed dividends could be taxed only in the hands of the shareholders of the lending company.
This decision of the High Court came to be upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr v. N S Narendra
In this case, the Karnataka High Court held that the loan given to a shareholder to avail credit facility from the bank in the name of the shareholder cannot be treated as Deemed Dividend under Income Tax Act.
The bench observed that the loan wasn’t given to the assessee just because he was a shareholder but to avail loan from the bank for some business purposes.
Earlier, when this case went before the commissioner of income tax (appeals), it was held that the payments obtained by the assessee from the Company cannot be termed as deemed dividends because the payment was not for the benefit of the assessee.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld these findings.
The High Court noted that the company derived benefits from the assessee. Hence, the loan was granted to the assessee. The Court affirmed the findings of the commissioner of income tax (appeals) and the Tribunal’s findings. The Court relied upon the decision of the Calcutta High Court in the case- Pradip Kumar Malhotra vs CIT.
Deemed dividends can be a productive idea for a closely held company to provide loans and advances to shareholders with substantial interest. To obtain deemed dividend, a person must understand the complex eligibility requirements and tax rules governing deemed dividend under the income tax act.
Read Our Article: Taxability of Dividend in Income Tax Returns
Experiencing the loss of a loved one is one of the deepest emotional hardships a person can fac...
On January 16, 2025, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) released the list of Non-Banking Financial...
Over the decades, the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) has been a key pillar in the portf...
The Reserve Bank of India, on April 11, 2025, posted a Press Release No. 2025-2026/96 on their...
Hong Kong is widely recognized as a leading global business hub, known for its free-market econ...
Are you human?: 7 + 8 =
Easy Payment Options Available No Spam. No Sharing. 100% Confidentiality
The new Financial Year begins on 1st of April every year and ends on 31st March of the following year. Every year o...
06 Apr, 2021
As the new financial year kicks in, there are many income tax rules that also sets in. From income tax on crypto as...
02 Apr, 2022