Advisory Services
Audit
Consulting
ESG Advisory
RBI Registration
SEBI Registration
IRDA Registration
FEMA Advisory
Compliances
IBC Services
VCFO Services
Growing
Developing
ME-1
ME-2
EU-1
EU-2
SE
Others
Select Your Location
Table of Contents
One or more than one person can bring the legal suit. But sometimes there might be a situation where the suit is against a corporation or a company, and large number of people gets involved directly or indirectly in the matter. In such a case, the tribunal (National Company Law Tribunal) cannot deal with every individual case on the same subject matter with regard to one company. Therefore, to handle this matter the Companies Act, 2013 has come up with a concept of Class Action Suit. The Class action suit makes sure that numerous aggrieved persons having a standard interest in an exceedingly touch be represented as one unit on a standard platform. This formation as one unit gives them right to sue against and be sued by a corporation or a company.
The class action suits can be brought under section 245 of the Companies Act 2013. Class action suits are those suits which can be filed by a large number of people having the same interest instead of filing many individual suits on the same particular subject matter. Whenever the shareholders or creditors/depositors consider that the management of a company is having some issues which are prejudicial to the interests of the shareholders or depositors or both, in such a case, they can together file a class action suit. In the suit, names of only a few people will be present who represent the whole group of aggrieved persons.
These class action suits are effectively useful in terms of both time and money. It is beneficial for those individuals who cannot bear the expenses of their own suits. It also saves the time of tribunal to collectively hold the numbers of cases in one go. When the group of people is represented by a specific number of people, every issue of each person can be heard for the common cause before the tribunal. All the aggrieved parties can share the expenses or costs for the litigation and make it a cost-effective procedure as a whole.
When the members or depositors are of the opinion that management conducting any affairs of a company which are against the interests of such group of members or depositors, then all can file an application collectively on behalf of all such aggrieved persons before the Tribunal for seeking the relief orders under Section 245(1). The relief is granted other than under this section if following is violated:
Sub-section (2) of Section 245 states that whenever such members or depositors seek damages or compensation from the audit firm which is responsible for the fraudulent furnishing of accounts of the company, then the liability is not only of the firm; it also extends to every partner who took part in such unlawful, wrongful, fraudulent activity.
Section 245 Sub-section (3) provides about the number of people required for filing an application to bring the suit in action. The requisite number of members or depositors for filing the application under Section 245 sub-section (1) has been clarified through the latest amendment in Rule 84 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016. This has prescribed the requisite number and hence has given rise to latest amendment of the National Company Law Tribunal (Second Amendment) Rules, 2019.
According to new amendment, in case of a company having share-capital, the requisite number is:
In the case of depositors, the requisite number is:
See Our Recommendation: Appeal on National Company Law Tribunal Process & Requirement.
After the consideration of an application under Section 245 Sub-section (1), the Tribunal has to consider the following matters, as per provisions of Section 245 Sub-section (4), which are:
According to Section 245 Sub-section (5), the Tribunal must look after the following matters after an admission of an application which is:
Section 245 Sub-section (6)states that any order passed by the respective Tribunal in regard to the class action suit then it must be binding upon all the members, depositors, directors, officers, audit firms, audit consultant, experts or any other persons who are associated with the company and its mal-practices.
Section 245 Sub-section (7) states that if a company fails to comply with the order passed by the tribunal, Rs.5 lakhs has to be paid as a penalty amount which can be extended upto Rs.25 lakhs for the company as penalty. An officer of a company who is in default and fails to comply with an order passed by the Tribunal, then he must punished with an imprisonment which may extend to 3 years and also imposing of fine, which cannot be less than Rs.25,000 and may extend upto Rs.1,00,000.
Section 245 Sub-section (8) states that when the Tribunal gets to know that an application filed by members or depositors is frivolous, then it may reject the application per se. The Tribunal will record reasons for rejection of an application in writing. The tribunal can also impose fine on the applicant to pay costs not exceeding Rs.1 Lakhs as a penalty to the opposite party. The amount to be paid is specified in the order passed by the Tribunal.
Section 245 Sub-section (9) states that procedure cannot be applicable to any banking company. Any company other than a banking company is covered under this section of the Act.
Section 245 Sub-section (10) states that the persons who is filing an application or taking any action under sub-section (1) of Section 245 as a class action suit shall complies with all the provisions and requirements that are relevantly provided under the Act.
Class action suit is helpful in reducing costs for the people who are aggrieved due to the same cause of action and unable to approach the Tribunal independently for justice. Under the previous Companies Act, there was a concept called ‘oppression and mismanagement’ wherein the suit can be instituted only against the company. But under the Companies Act 2013, class action suits are a new concept which covers every associated person who involves in an unlawful activity such as auditors, experts, consultants, etc. And they can also be punished. Class action suits increase a sense of responsibility and diligence in the companies with respect to protecting the interests of the stakeholders. This is because the vigilant stakeholders are paid attention to and being addressed by the Tribunal through the class action suit, which is a very good sign for the protection of corporate ethics in the corporate world for upholding fair practices.
Also, Read: ITR Refund: Know about the Easiest way to Calculate and Claim it.
Soumya has done LLB (Hons) and has a 2+years experience in writing. Her main interest is in reading judgments, new enactments and amendments taking around in law. She always strives to bring the best to work that she does.
Black money has been the subject of heated political debate in India for a long time. Successiv...
The Apex Court pronounced a judgement in the case titled Tata Motors Vs The Brihan Mumbai Elect...
Since economies are moving towards digitalisation and making it feasible to conduct transaction...
The Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) Pro-rata and Pari-Passu Rights Proposal Consultation Pa...
The Financial Action Task Force, i.e. FATF (the Force), is the global money laundering and terr...
Advance tax refers to the payment of the tax liability before the end of the relevant financia...
On 11.12.15, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court (HC) pronounced a landmark judgement in the case ti...
Money laundering can be defined as the process of illegal concealment of the origin of money ob...
Every assessee in India is obligated to file an income tax return and make the timely payment o...
In the recent past, India has seen burgeoning demand for internet and smartphones. The rapid ri...
Are you human?: 6 + 6 =
Easy Payment Options Available No Spam. No Sharing. 100% Confidentiality
Today everyone desires to grow and expand their business globally. However, it may not be as easy as you would thin...
03 Jun, 2021
A Partnership is a business that is owned by two or more individuals. As a result, management, liability and earnin...
30 Jun, 2022
Red Herring Top 100 Asia enlists outstanding entrepreneurs and promising companies. It selects the award winners from approximately 2000 privately financed companies each year in the Asia. Since 1996, Red Herring has kept tabs on these up-and-comers. Red Herring editors were among the first to recognize that companies such as Google, Facebook, Kakao, Alibaba, Twitter, Rakuten, Salesforce.com, Xiaomi and YouTube would change the way we live and work.
Researchers have found out that organization using new technologies in their accounting and tax have better productivity as compared to those using the traditional methods. Complying with the recent technological trends in the accounting industry, Enterslice was formed to focus on the emerging start up companies and bring innovation in their traditional Chartered Accountants & Legal profession services, disrupt traditional Chartered Accountants practice mechanism & Lawyers.
Stay updated with all the latest legal updates. Just enter your email address and subscribe for free!
Chat on Whatsapp
Hey I'm Suman. Let's Talk!