Direct Tax
Consulting
ESG Advisory
Indirect Tax
Growth Advisory
Internal Audit
BFSI Audit
Industry Audit
Valuation
RBI Services
SEBI Services
IRDA Registration
AML Advisory
IBC Services
Recovery of Shares
NBFC Compliance
IRDA Compliance
Finance & Accounts
Payroll Compliance Services
HR Outsourcing
LPO
Fractional CFO
General Legal
Corporate Law
Debt Recovery
Select Your Location
The NBFC sector in India has long played a key role in credit distribution. However, the biggest risk they have faced in recent years is the rising non-performing asset NBFC. Borrower defaults, market uncertainty, and sector-specific pressures have made NBFC NPA challenges more complex.
Rising NPAs have a direct impact on liquidity, profitability, and business stability. Many NBFCs are unable to identify risks promptly due to problems in collection systems, monitoring, and risk assessment. So, recovery becomes more difficult.
In this context, it is important to understand what challenges NBFCs face in managing NPAs and why reducing or recovering NPAs is now a major challenge for them. Especially if you are an NBFC business enthusiast seeking NBFC registration, you must go through this write-up. In this section, we will highlight the key issues, sources of risk, and business Challenges in NPA management.
A loan is classified as a non-performing asset (NPA) when it is due more than 90 days, as per RBI norms. In NBFCs, it is divided into three categories: substandard, doubtful, and loss assets. At each stage, the risk increases and the chances of recovery decrease.
Accurately identifying NPA is important for NBFCs because it is easier to reduce losses if the risk is understood at the beginning. But many NBFCs still cannot identify the risk in time due to weak systems, data gaps, and field-level monitoring problems. These difficulties in NPA monitoring for NBFCs later create major financial stress and reduce the stability of the business.
There are many reasons behind the NPA issues in NBFCs that are seen in the NBFC sector today. Many NBFCs give unsecured loans at high rates. Economic uncertainty, market downturn, and reduced cash flow of small businesses have led to borrowers not being able to repay their loans on time.
In addition, the credit appraisal process of many NBFCs is still weak. If loans are sanctioned based on outdated or incomplete financial information, defaults may increase in the future. Real estate, MSME, and microfinance sectors are the three sectors where the risk is higher.
Another major problem is internal governance and operational gaps. If there are irregularities in document verification, risk assessment, and field monitoring, NPAs increase rapidly. These factors combine to create the biggest NPA problems for NBFCs and make the recovery process more difficult.
NBFC NPA challenges are becoming more complex in the NBFC sector. There are many limitations in the various stages of risk identification, monitoring, and recovery. Each challenge is explained separately below.
Many NBFCs still do not use a well-developed Early Warning System. The monitoring required to understand the borrower’s behaviour, cash flow, or business stress is not strong enough. Due to the lack of predictive analytics, risk signals are not detected in time.
So, the NBFC realizes it very late, even though the possibility of non-repayment increases. These early warning system challenges have become one of the biggest weaknesses of the NBFC sector.
Many NBFCs rely on old financial information or incomplete data during credit assessment. Failure to calculate the actual risk of the business increases the possibility of default in the future. Risk profiling is low in many cases, and collateral valuation is also not done properly. So, loans are sanctioned without understanding the actual risk, which later creates large NPA issues in NBFCs.
Many NBFCs still use manual tracking systems, where data collection and updating are slow. It becomes difficult to follow up with borrowers spread across different regions regularly. Risk assessment is also incorrect due to a lack of timely repayment data. Due to these difficulties in NPA monitoring for NBFCs, non-performing assets of NBFCs continue to increase rapidly in the NBFC sector, which further increases the overall risk.
The collection capacity of NBFCs is less than banks. The absence of a specialized recovery team makes it difficult to handle complex accounts. Reluctance of borrowers, legal challenges, and the slow notice process further delay collection. So, NPA recovery challenges are more complex, and the cost is also higher compared to the outstanding amount.
Not all NBFCs can seize or sell assets quickly using the SARFAESI Act. This slows down the recovery process. In addition, court, arbitration, and notice-based remedies are time-consuming. Litigation also gets prolonged due to complications related to the verification of documents or ownership. These legal hurdles are among the biggest NPA problems for NBFCs.
Many NBFCs face a lack of adequate collateral. The high level of unsecured loans reduces the certainty of recovery. Sometimes there are cases of deliberate default, fraud, or misinformation, which complicates the recovery process.
Recovery systems are not modern in many cases: manual follow-up, inefficient collection teams, and a lack of online tracking slow down the recovery process. It is also difficult to understand the actual repayment capacity due to the lack of financial transparency of the borrowers.
Added to this are the costs of legal fees, field visits, notices, etc., which are higher than the amount due. All this together explains why NBFCs struggle with NPA recovery and why the challenges in NPA management are becoming increasingly complex.
NBFC NPA challenges are compounded by the lack of adequate use of technology in the NBFC sector. Many NBFCs do not yet use advanced AI-based risk scoring systems. It leads to an inaccurate understanding of the true risk of the borrower. Data integration is also weak, as customer data is spread across multiple systems.
Credit reporting in rural and semi-urban areas is often incomplete or inconsistent. This data gap increases difficulties in NPA monitoring for NBFCs and delays risk identification. So, non-performing assets are increasing rapidly in NBFCs.
Internal structures of various NBFCs are still fragmented, resulting in weak information flow and coordination. High staff turnover in credit and collection teams reduces experience and slows down NPA follow-up.
Many NBFCs do not have standardized processes: document verification, risk assessment, follow-up or approval procedures are not done in the same way everywhere. Due to a lack of adequate training of field officers and credit staff, errors in assessment occur. All this further increases the challenges in NPA management.
The key reasons for the rise in NPAs of NBFCs include weak monitoring, lack of adequate data, outdated valuation methods, legal constraints and ineffective collection mechanisms. If these are not addressed properly, liquidity crunch and business risk increase further. Therefore, modern data systems, new technologies, improved governance and effective recovery mechanisms are now very much needed.
Enterslice provides complete support to NBFCs, like NPA management, compliance support, risk assessment, RBI reporting, NBFC registration, NBFC due diligence, digital upgradation and regulatory advisory. Expert support speeds up recovery and helps ensure long-term financial stability. Enterslice can be your trusted advisor in resolving NPA issues in NBFCs.
The biggest problems facing NBFCs are weak monitoring, lack of accurate data, errors in customer solvency analysis and weak collection mechanisms at the field level. Many NBFCs still do not use modern technology in risk analysis, resulting in rapid growth of non-performing assets NBFC. All these factors are making NBFC NPA challenges.
NBFCs have a relatively risky customer base and often have lower collateral value. NBFCs do not always have the same strong legal powers or supervisory mechanisms as banks. Since many NBFCs are small in size, they do not have sufficient staff or technology support to deal with NPA recovery challenges. So, the recovery process becomes longer and more expensive.
In NBFC NPA challenges, repayments are slow due to irregular income and risky customer profiles. There are fewer collection staff at the field level, resulting in slow follow-up. So, the big answer to the question of what challenges NBFCs face in managing NPAs is lack of consistency in data, monitoring and collection.
When warning signals are not caught early, the loan problem takes a big shape. Many NBFCs have weak data integration, resulting in changes in risk not being seen in time. If the score is not updated based on changes in business or customer behavior, action cannot be taken before the problem occurs. Due to these early warning system challenges, the risk of NPA increases rapidly.
In most NBFCs, customer data is not stored in one place, making tracking difficult. There is often a lack of coordination between the collection team and the credit team. Difficulties in NPA monitoring for NBFCs are further compounded by slow field reporting. In the absence of a proper MIS system, risks increase, which ultimately leads to an increase in NPAs.
Weak document verification, incorrect assessment of customer income and expenditure and lack of business sustainability; all these increase risks. If the actual repayment capacity of the customer is not properly understood, the loan quickly turns into default. Due Diligence failure increases non-performing assets in the NBFC sector and is one of the biggest NBFC NPA challenges.
Digital monitoring, automated scoring, real-time follow-up and data analytics; these technologies help NBFCs identify risky accounts earlier. Technology-based recovery tools speed up field work and reduce errors. Thus, technology plays a major role in addressing NPA challenges and helps in maintaining long-term stability.
NBFCs do not have the same legal authority as banks. Not all NBFCs are allowed to use the SARFAESI Act. The court process is lengthy, and sometimes the value of collateral is found to be less than the actual case. These legal constraints increase NPA recovery challenges and slow down the recovery process.
Increasing field visits, income verification, transaction data analysis, adopting digital scoring and considering business risks; all these improve credit appraisal. Proper credit appraisal plays a major role in reducing the NBFC NPA challenges in the future. Regular training and transparent documentation also help in reducing risks.
Enterslice provides NPA risk assessment, recovery strategies, data analytics, RBI reporting, compliance and technology-based solutions. Creates effective monitoring systems and helps NBFCs move towards modern governance. NPA pressure is reduced, and operations are more stable with the expert team. We help NBFCs grow by reducing financial risks in the long term.
The NBFC sector in India has long played a key role in credit distribution. However, the bigges...
The world of offshore jurisdictions is clouded by misconceptions. But these financial hubs like...
Azerbaijan is rapidly positioning itself as a gateway between Europe and Asia and its free zone...
NBFCs or Non-Banking Financial Companies play a vital role in the Indian economy. They provide...
NBFCs, or Non-Banking Finance Companies, play a very important role in the Indian economy. In t...
Are you human?: 7 + 1 =
Easy Payment Options Available No Spam. No Sharing. 100% Confidentiality
Housing Finance is a broad topic, the idea of which can differ across continents, regions & countries, mainly i...
07 Dec, 2020
On 16th May 2019, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) made it mandatory for Non-Banking Financial Companies having asse...
24 Jun, 2023
9870310368 
8860712800