Direct Tax
Consulting
ESG Advisory
Indirect Tax
Growth Advisory
Internal Audit
BFSI Audit
Industry Audit
Valuation
RBI Services
SEBI Services
IRDA Registration
AML Advisory
IBC Services
NBFC Compliance
IRDA Compliance
Finance & Accounts
Payroll Compliance Services
HR Outsourcing
LPO
Fractional CFO
General Legal
Corporate Law
Debt Recovery
Select Your Location
Operational risk (ORM) refers to the risk of loss resulting from poor or failed internal processes, people, systems, or external events that can disrupt the flow of corporate operations. Financial losses might happen either directly or indirectly. A poorly trained employee, for example, may lose a sales opportunity, or poor customer service may hurt a company’s reputation. Both the risk of running a firm and the procedures employed by management for defining, teaching, and enforcing rules are examples of operational risk. Overlooked issues and control failures, whether minor or big, contribute to risk materialization, which may result in an organizational failure that hurts a company’s bottom line and reputation. Examples of Operational risk includes employee conduct, cybersecurity attacks, technology risks, business processes and controls, physical events, internal fraud and external fraud.
Operational risk management reduces and controls any risks to an acceptable level through risk identification, assessment, measurement, and mitigation, as well as monitoring and reporting. It is guided by various principles: accept risk when the benefits outweigh the costs, anticipate and manage risk through planning, and make risk decisions at the appropriate level.
ORM procedures are primarily focused on controls and risk elimination, whereas other risk disciplines, such as ERM, emphasize optimizing risk tolerances to balance risk-taking and possible benefits. The ORM framework begins with identifying risks and deciding on a mitigation strategy. Operational Risk Management aims to protect the organization by eliminating or reducing risk. It can cover various issues, including fraud risks, technological risks, and the day-to-day operations of finance teams. The Risk Management Association defines ORM as the risk of loss caused by inadequate or failing internal processes, people, systems, and external events. Using a control framework, whether formal or internally produced, can help in the design of internal control processes. One method for understanding how ORM processes appear in an organization is to categorize operational risks such as people, technology, and regulatory risks.
The people category includes employees, consumers, vendors, and other stakeholders. Employee risk includes both unintentional wrongdoing and purposeful malfeasance, such as fraud. Policy violations, insufficient education, inadequate training, poor decision making, and fraudulent actions are all risks. There are several operational risks that include people who are not employees of the organization. Employees, customers, and vendors all pose a risk while using social media. Monitoring and regulating the people component of operation risk is one of the most comprehensive areas of coverage.
Technology risk includes hardware, software, privacy, and security from an operational approach. Technology risk affects both the overall organization and the people mentioned above. Hardware limitations may limit productivity, particularly in a remote work environment. When applications increase efficiency or employees lack training, software can reduce productivity. Software may also have an impact on how customers interact with your company. External hazards include hackers attempting to steal data or hijack networks. This can lead to the disclosure of client information and data privacy issues.
Almost every business is vulnerable to regulatory noncompliance. Although certain industries are more strictly regulated than others, all laws come down to the adoption of internal controls. In the last decade, the quantity and complexity of laws, as well as penalties, have increased.
There are four risk mitigation methods in the Operational Risk Management process: transfer, avoid, accept, and control.
The risk is transferred to a different organization. The two most popular types of transfer are outsourcing and insurance. When outsourcing, management cannot completely offload risk management obligations. Insuring against the risk transfers some of the financial weight of the risk to the insurance company. Cloud-based software enterprises are an excellent example of risk transfer. When a company purchases cloud-based software, the contract almost always contains a data breach insurance clause. The customer guarantees that the vendor will pay for any losses incurred as a result of a data breach. Meanwhile, the vendor will request that its data centre provide SOC reports indicating that proper controls are in place to decrease the likelihood of a data breach.
Avoidance keeps the organization from being entangled in a risk issue. For example, when selecting a vendor for a service, the corporation may choose to accept a higher-priced bid if the lower-cost vendor has suitable references.
Based on a cost-benefit analysis[1] of the risk vs. the expenditure of control, management could accept the risk and proceed with the riskier option. For example, if the company installs new coffee makers in the breakroom, an employee may burn themselves. The benefit of modern coffee makers to employee satisfaction outweighs the risk of an employee unintentionally burning himself on a hot cup of coffee. Therefore, management accepts the risk and installs the new equipment.
Controls are methods that an organization uses to lessen the impact of a risk if it occurs or to increase the likelihood of achieving the goal. Installing software behind a firewall, for example, reduces the likelihood of hackers gaining access, and backing up the network lessens the impact of a hacked network because it can be restored to a safe state.
ORM is a component of enterprise risk management (ERM). Common problems include the assumption that firms do not have the resources to engage in ORM, the need for more communication and education about the importance of ORM, a lack of uniform methodology for measuring and assessing risk, and a lack of common risk language. Because of technological advancements, ORM systems can be manual, fragmented, and too complicated, and they are sometimes mixed in with other functions, such as compliance and IT.
Establishing an effective operational risk management program can assist a company in meeting its strategic objectives while ensuring business continuity in the event of an interruption in operations. A strong ORM also demonstrates to clients that the firm is prepared in the event of a tragedy or loss. Organizations who successfully create a strong ORM program can obtain competitive advantages such as:
Thus, we can conclude that Operational risk management is a critical aspect of managing a business. It involves risk identification, assessment, measurement, and mitigation, as well as monitoring and reporting. The objective is to eliminate or reduce risk and the challenges and benefits of implementing an effective Operational Risk Management program. Operational Risk Management is essential for ensuring business continuity and achieving strategic objectives while mitigating potential risks.
Read our Article: Managing Operational Risks in Banking
The end of the fiscal year is crucial for finance teams. Finance professionals spend much time...
The centre redesigned the AIF scheme to cover the FPOs (Farmer Producer Organizations) to stren...
India has long been a trading nation with a wealth of priceless potential and superior knowledg...
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has a major role in regulating the securities...
Due to rising credit and financial needs, India's Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFC) sector...
Are you human?: 9 + 4 =
Easy Payment Options Available No Spam. No Sharing. 100% Confidentiality
According to Accounting Standards 200 (SA 200), basic principles of auditing or the basic principles governing an a...
21 May, 2022
The Companies Act, 2013 under Section 138, states that a class or classes of companies as prescribed would be requi...
10 Aug, 2021