Select Your Location
MCA has enacted Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 (“Amendment Act”) on the suggestions made by Company Law Committee (CLC) and notified the same in the official gazette on May 7, 2018 to streamline the existing practices followed by Companies in India and to add more clarity to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. It has substituted the existing section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013. This Section-185 was originally brought into effect from September 12, 2013 which corresponds to section 295 of Companies Act, 1956. This section doesn’t apply to Govt. Companies, Private Companies and Nidhi Companies subject to conditions specified in respective exemption notifications issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA).
With the introduction of Companies Act, 2013, the section 185 is a prohibitory section, was of great importance. There was no scope to apply to Central Government’s approval for non-applicability of such restrictions. Further, the section was applicable to both public as well as private companies, which was unacceptable by private companies. Thereafter the MCA vide exemption notification dated June 5, 2015 exempted private companies from the provisions under section 185 which brought great relief to the private companies. Whereas, that relief is even subject to stipulated conditions. Hence, to promote ease of doing business, the entire section has been substituted.
The substituted Section 185 deals with the restrictions on the part of the Companies in advancing any loan or giving any guarantee or providing any security and to those whom a Company can provide such loan or guarantee or security subject to compliances under the Act. Also, section provides relaxation for Individuals and Entities from the provisions of Sec. 185 subject to certain conditions and Punishment for those who contravene the same.
Table of Contents
The intent of the provisions of Section 185 is manly to ensure that directors who hold a fiduciary position with respect to shareholders cannot utilize funds of the company for their own benefit. However, the company laws do not provide for a complete blanket prohibition on the advancement of loans/guarantee/security to directors and their related entities.
It is important to note that where the shareholders of the company, who are the absolute owners, themselves, approve the utilization of the funds of the company in the prescribed manner, the law does not create a bar on the same. Thus, with the global company laws, the provision has been amended to remove the prohibition to an extent and provides for the passing of shareholders’ resolution for granting of loans/guarantees/securities to entities in which directors are interested.
The section prohibits the granting of loan/guarantee/security to some people, while restricts the others in the following way
And restrictive to:
The amended provisions have allowed the companies to grant loans/guarantees/securities to any entities in which directors are interested, in the above mentioned restrictive cases, but subject to prior approval of the shareholders by passing a special resolution and on condition that the loans are utilized by the borrower for principal business activities so far.
In order to make sure that the companies do not take advantage of the relief, the amended provisions ensure that there is no wasting of funds received by the companies. As the amount received under the section must be utilized by the borrower for its principal business activities and not for investment or to grant the loan.
Also, loans extended to persons, including subsidiaries, falling within the restrictive purview of Section 185 should be used by the subsidiary for its principal business activity only, and not for further investment or grant of loan.
It is important that the provisions of amended law do not explicitly require any prior approval, under section 186 and 188 of Companies Act.
Although, the Report of Companies Law Committee, 2016 recommended by the special resolution to a prior resolution. However, the wordings of the amended section 185 do not specify whether the special resolution must be prior to advancing the loan/guarantee/security.
However, as per the provision of the amended law, the explanatory statement to the notice of the general meeting is required to disclose the full details of the loan/guarantee/security given. Thus, one may infer that such a resolution has to be passed after granting of such loan/guarantee/security.
As per the Report of the Companies Law Committee 2016, the rate of interest for loans granted under the section 185 was proposed to be aligned with section 186(7). Further, the report suggested that it may not be appropriate to apply Indian interest rates benchmarks prescribed under the section 186(7) to loans given by companies to foreign entities and the effective yield against the loan given, irrespective of whether the loan is given to a company incorporated outside India must not be less than the prescribed rate under the section 186(7).
Although the exemption provided to companies which in the ordinary course of its business provides loans or gives guarantees or securities for the due repayment of any loan requires the rate not to be less than the rate of prevailing yield of 1 year, 3 year, 5 year or 10 year Government security closest to the tenor of the loan, however, no such interest rate is provided for the persons falling within the restrictive purview of Section 185.
The amended section 185 has extended the penal provisions to an officer of the company, which has been defined in section 2(59) to include any director, manager or key managerial personnel or any person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the Board of Directors or any one or more of the directors is or are accustomed to act. Therefore, the ambit of the penal provision has been widely extended.
The amended section 185 seeks to completely replace the existing provisions of section 185 of Companies Act, 2013. However, the exemption notification dated June 5, 2015 has to continue to hold good and the amended provisions of section 185 must be not applicable to private companies subject to the conditions prescribed in the notification.
As per the exemption notification dated June 5, 2015 only those private companies which fulfill the prescribed conditions are exempted from the provisions of section 185. Hence, private companies which do not fulfill the conditions prescribed are subject to the prohibition as per the amended section 185, i.e., the private companies, which do not fulfill the conditions for availing the exemption, will be able to grant loan/guarantee/ security under the restrictive purview.
Subsection 4 talks about the punishment, where any loan advanced or a guarantee or security given or provided or utilized in contravention of the provisions of this section.
The amended provision clearly excludes employees of the company from the term ‘person’ to whom a company cannot directly or indirectly give loan exceeding the prescribed threshold. The same was clarified by the Ministry vide its General Circular dated 10th March, 2015. However, the said Circular provided two conditions for such exclusion i.e. the loan being given should be in terms of service policy of the company along with the same being in terms of remuneration policy of the company – these conditions are no more applicable, as the provision directly excludes employees from the term ‘person’.
As per the amended provisions the shareholders’ approval will not be required where a loan or guarantee is given or where a security has been provided by a company to it’s:
The exemption will increase the investing power of the company.
The exemption of the non-applicability of the provision of section 186 (except the provision related to restriction on layers of subsidiaries) has been extended to a rights issue made by a body corporate specifically to include foreign company.
As per the amended provisions:
a company shall be deemed to be principally engaged in the business of acquisition of shares, debentures or other securities, if its assets in the form of investment in shares, debentures or other securities constitute not less than 50% of its total assets, or if its income derived from investment business constitutes must not less than 50% as the proportion of its gross income.
Section 185(1) prohibits for providing the loan/guarantee/security to certain individuals such as Director of Lending and holding companies and firms in which such director/relative is a partner. The company may provide loan/guarantee/security in connection with any loan taken by any person in whom any of the directors of the company is interested, subject to conditions of prior approval, by ways of special resolution or loan utilization as per section 185(2). According to Section 185(3), the entities and individuals are exempted from section 185(1) and 185(2) such as holding and subsidiary companies, banking companies, NBFCs etc. Further, on non- compliance and contravention with provisions, the punishment is provided in section 185(4). Hence, it can be said the relief brought under both the section will be widely accepted by all.
Read, Also: Inter Corporate Loans and Investments According to Section 186 of the Companies Act 2013.
Soumya has done LLB (Hons) and has a 2+years experience in writing. Her main interest is in reading judgments, new enactments and amendments taking around in law. She always strives to bring the best to work that she does.
Black money has been the subject of heated political debate in India for a long time. Successiv...
The Apex Court pronounced a judgement in the case titled Tata Motors Vs The Brihan Mumbai Elect...
Since economies are moving towards digitalisation and making it feasible to conduct transaction...
The Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) Pro-rata and Pari-Passu Rights Proposal Consultation Pa...
The Financial Action Task Force, i.e. FATF (the Force), is the global money laundering and terr...
Advance tax refers to the payment of the tax liability before the end of the relevant financia...
On 11.12.15, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court (HC) pronounced a landmark judgement in the case ti...
Money laundering can be defined as the process of illegal concealment of the origin of money ob...
Every assessee in India is obligated to file an income tax return and make the timely payment o...
In the recent past, India has seen burgeoning demand for internet and smartphones. The rapid ri...
Are you human?: 6 + 7 =
Easy Payment Options Available No Spam. No Sharing. 100% Confidentiality
In a growing economy, the Real Estate sector invites a lot of attention from all quarters, including foreigners. In...
17 May, 2019
The companies having their website are required to adhere to certain provisions and compliances about website discl...
28 Feb, 2019
Red Herring Top 100 Asia enlists outstanding entrepreneurs and promising companies. It selects the award winners from approximately 2000 privately financed companies each year in the Asia. Since 1996, Red Herring has kept tabs on these up-and-comers. Red Herring editors were among the first to recognize that companies such as Google, Facebook, Kakao, Alibaba, Twitter, Rakuten, Salesforce.com, Xiaomi and YouTube would change the way we live and work.
Researchers have found out that organization using new technologies in their accounting and tax have better productivity as compared to those using the traditional methods. Complying with the recent technological trends in the accounting industry, Enterslice was formed to focus on the emerging start up companies and bring innovation in their traditional Chartered Accountants & Legal profession services, disrupt traditional Chartered Accountants practice mechanism & Lawyers.
Stay updated with all the latest legal updates. Just enter your email address and subscribe for free!
Chat on Whatsapp
Hey I'm Suman. Let's Talk!