GST Circulars

CBIC Issues New Circular Clarifying GST on Personal and Corporate Guarantees

CBIC Issues New Circular Clarifying GST on Personal and Corporate Guarantees

The world of taxation, particularly in the realm of Goods and Services Tax (GST), is often beset with complexities and nuances. A recent development, articulated in Circular No. 204/16/2023-GST, issued by the Government of India’s Ministry of Finance, has thrown light on the intriguing aspect of taxability concerning personal and corporate guarantees. This circular, aimed at clarifying the position on GST implications for personal guarantees by directors and corporate guarantees by related entities, is pivotal for the finance sector, primarily affecting how companies and their directors handle guarantees for credit facilities.

Personal Guarantees by Directors

1. Definition and Scope

The circular confirms that a director’s personal guarantee to a bank or financial institution, for procuring credit facilities for their company, is considered a ‘supply of service’. Notably, this holds even if no consideration (payment or fee) is exchanged, due to the director and the company being ‘related persons’ under the CGST Act.

2. Valuation of Supply

A key aspect is the valuation of this supply of service. As per Rule 28 of CGST Rules, the taxable value should be the open market value of the service. However, RBI guidelines prohibit directors from receiving any consideration for providing personal guarantees. Consequently, in most cases, the value of these guarantees would be zero, nullifying any GST liability.

Corporate Guarantees

1. Definition and Scope

Corporate guarantees provided by one related company to another, or by a holding company for its subsidiary, are similarly treated as supply of services. This interpretation extends to scenarios lacking any consideration, reflecting the broad ambit of related party transactions under GST.

READ  CBIC Circular Clarifies Key Taxation Queries on Services and Supplies

2. Valuation and Taxability

The circular stipulates that the taxable value for such guarantees must follow Rule 28 of CGST Rules, as revised. The introduction of sub-rule (2) in this Rule aims to standardize the valuation process across different cases, ensuring a consistent tax treatment.

Potential Implications and Forward-Looking Insights

Impact on Business Operations

  1. Increased Compliance: Companies must now meticulously evaluate their transactions involving directors’ and corporate guarantees for GST implications.
  2. Financial Planning: The potential GST liability, especially in the context of corporate guarantees, might require recalibration of financial strategies and cost management.

Legal and Regulatory Perspective

  1. Harmonization with RBI Guidelines: The circular’s adherence to RBI norms on personal guarantees ensures a coordinated approach between financial and tax regulations.
  2. Uniformity in Tax Treatment: The standardized rule for valuation under GST for corporate guarantees helps in alleviating ambiguities, enabling more predictable and equitable tax treatment across entities.

Future Trajectory

  1. Technological Integration: Automation and advanced compliance systems will likely play a crucial role in managing the complexities arising from these clarifications.
  2. Advisory and Consultation: There’s an anticipated surge in demand for expert legal and financial advice to navigate these changes, opening avenues for professional services in taxation and corporate law.
  3. Policy Evolution: This clarification may just be the tip of the iceberg, indicating a trend towards more detailed scrutiny of corporate financial practices under GST.

Real-World Examples and Case Studies

  1. Case of Director’s Guarantee: In XYZ Ltd., a director’s guarantee to a bank with no consideration would generally bear no GST. But if the director is compensated indirectly, GST might be applicable on the guarantee value, which could be benchmarked to similar transactions in the market.
  2. Scenario of Holding Company Guarantees: For ABC Group, where the holding company provides guarantees to its subsidiary, ABC Group must evaluate the guarantee’s market value for GST, notwithstanding the absence of direct consideration. This would necessitate an analysis of comparable guarantees in the market to ascertain a defensible taxable value.
READ  GST Circulars List: All Important Circulars


The clarifications provided in Circular No. 204/16/2023-GST are not just about additional compliance but also about understanding the strategic tax implications of corporate financial decisions. The nuanced nature of GST law as it pertains to related party transactions, especially in the context of guarantees, necessitates a vigilant and informed approach from businesses and their advisors. As India’s financial landscape evolves, keeping abreast with such regulatory updates will be crucial for sustaining and thriving in the complex world of corporate finance.


Trending Posted

Get Started Live Chat