Direct Tax
Consulting
ESG Advisory
Indirect Tax
Growth Advisory
Internal Audit
BFSI Audit
Industry Audit
Valuation
RBI Services
SEBI Services
IRDA Registration
AML Advisory
IBC Services
NBFC Compliance
IRDA Compliance
Finance & Accounts
HR Outsourcing
LPO
Fractional CFO
General Legal
Corporate Law
Debt Recovery
Select Your Location
The world of taxation, particularly in the realm of Goods and Services Tax (GST), is often beset with complexities and nuances. A recent development, articulated in Circular No. 204/16/2023-GST, issued by the Government of India’s Ministry of Finance, has thrown light on the intriguing aspect of taxability concerning personal and corporate guarantees. This circular, aimed at clarifying the position on GST implications for personal guarantees by directors and corporate guarantees by related entities, is pivotal for the finance sector, primarily affecting how companies and their directors handle guarantees for credit facilities.
Table of Contents
The circular confirms that a director’s personal guarantee to a bank or financial institution, for procuring credit facilities for their company, is considered a ‘supply of service’. Notably, this holds even if no consideration (payment or fee) is exchanged, due to the director and the company being ‘related persons’ under the CGST Act.
A key aspect is the valuation of this supply of service. As per Rule 28 of CGST Rules, the taxable value should be the open market value of the service. However, RBI guidelines prohibit directors from receiving any consideration for providing personal guarantees. Consequently, in most cases, the value of these guarantees would be zero, nullifying any GST liability.
Corporate guarantees provided by one related company to another, or by a holding company for its subsidiary, are similarly treated as supply of services. This interpretation extends to scenarios lacking any consideration, reflecting the broad ambit of related party transactions under GST.
The circular stipulates that the taxable value for such guarantees must follow Rule 28 of CGST Rules, as revised. The introduction of sub-rule (2) in this Rule aims to standardize the valuation process across different cases, ensuring a consistent tax treatment.
The clarifications provided in Circular No. 204/16/2023-GST are not just about additional compliance but also about understanding the strategic tax implications of corporate financial decisions. The nuanced nature of GST law as it pertains to related party transactions, especially in the context of guarantees, necessitates a vigilant and informed approach from businesses and their advisors. As India’s financial landscape evolves, keeping abreast with such regulatory updates will be crucial for sustaining and thriving in the complex world of corporate finance.
Gujarat (GIFT City) is a central business district that is under construction and located in th...
The Reserve Bank of India defines a bank as a legal entity that acts as a financial institution...
NBFC has been imposed by RBI with the mandatory filing of returns in XBRL mode from financial 2...
Accounts payable management is a difficult and time-consuming activity that necessitates consid...
What is a Stock Audit? The inventory is being physically checked. But occasionally, depending o...
Are you human?: 3 + 2 =
Easy Payment Options Available No Spam. No Sharing. 100% Confidentiality
Chat on Whatsapp
Hey I'm Suman. Let's Talk!