Select Your Location
Black money has been a topic of controversy and debate in the Indian economy and legal system ever since independence. The progress of the mainstream economy and the rise in corruption in society have both been hampered by the parallel economy, which is fueled by unreported black money. In order to stop the parallel economy and get rid of black money, the Indian government demonetized its currency in 2016. However, the majority of black money Act comes from taxpayers who refuse to report their income. The government is rapidly striving to strengthen responsibility for black money by adopting various measures and legislative and policy changes and establishing a network of local legislation and international treaties against tax evasion and money laundering.
The Government of India adopted the Black Money Act in 2015 to combat the production and circulation of black money both within and outside the nation. It tries to identify and sanction people who have unreported foreign income and assets, as well as to discover such unreported money and assets. The Act gives the government the authority to impose harsh fines and commence criminal prosecution against violators while also establishing a framework for the disclosure of concealed income and assets and their subsequent taxes.
Table of Contents
The Black Money Act, initially applicable only to residents of India, was amended in July 2019 to include non-residents and non-ordinary residents who were ordinary residents in the last year to which the foreign income relates or in the year in which the foreign asset was acquired. The Act covers two issues: undisclosed foreign income and undisclosed foreign assets. It imposes a base tax of 30% on any undisclosed foreign income/foreign asset detected by the Assessing Officer (AO), as well as a penalty of 90% (three times the amount of tax computed). There are also other penalties for non-disclosure of the required information and provisions for prosecution within the Act.
The provisions of this Act are identical to those of the Income-tax Act. The first appeal must be filed with the Commissioner (Appeals) within 30 days after the date of the serving of the demand notice – The assessee may submit an appeal if
The CIT(A) has the authority to allow the delay in submitting an appeal if the basis for the delay is shown and satisfactory, but only for a period of one year.
CIT(A) has the authority to;
Second appeals provisions are similar to provisions in the I. T. Act. Within 60 days of receiving the order, an appeal may be filed with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order of CIT(A) or CIT. If the assessee or Assessing Officer believes it is necessary, they may raise cross objections within 30 days of receiving the notification. If the ITAT ruling is upheld, additional appeals may be filed to the Hon’ble High Court and then to the Hon’ble Supreme Court if a question of law arises.
According to Section 23 of the Act, the CIT has the authority to revise an order issued by the AO if the order is inaccurate or prejudicial to the revenue’s interests. The CIT may amend any order if it is passed without making any necessary enquiries or verification. The review period is two years from the end of the year in which the order is passed.
Within a year after the end of the fiscal year in which the application is lodged, the CIT may reconsider any order made on an application filed by the assessee.
Under this Act, the following tax recovery methods are permitted:
Unless stayed, all requests must be paid within 30 days. Otherwise, the assessee will be in default.
In the case of an assessment made under section 10, the AO may prescribe that the assessee pays a penalty of three times the tax, or 90%. Unlike the I. T. Act, which has minimum and maximum penalty limitations, this Act has a flat penalty rate. There is no concept of penalty waiver based on the reasonable cause as provided under the I. T. Act.
If a PERSON who owns a foreign asset or has foreign income fails to file an income tax return (under the IT Act 1961) before the end of the Assessment Year, the AO may assess a penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs. However, no such penalty is imposed if the foreign asset, which is one or more foreign bank accounts, has an aggregate balance of less than Rs 5 lakhs at any time during the previous year.
If a PERSON with a foreign asset or foreign income submits his returns but fails to provide any information on his foreign assets or provides false information in his filings, the AO may assess a penalty of Rs 10 lakhs. However, no such penalty is imposed if the foreign asset, which is one or more foreign bank accounts, has an aggregate balance of less than Rs.1.5 lakhs at any time during the previous year.
Every assessee who is in default or is deemed to be in default in making tax payment within 30 days AND who continues to be in default shall be subject to a penalty equal to the amount of tax arrears. Even though the Assessee paid the tax before the penalty was imposed, he is still subject to the penalty under Section 44(1).
According to Section 48, prosecution provisions are separate from penalty provisions. This indicates that a prosecution under the Act is not impacted by whether an order is issued or not under the Act or under another legislation. The Act’s provisions for prosecution will remain in effect even if there is a delay in passing an order.
According to Sections 49 and 50, a resident who knowingly fails to provide a Return of Income or knowingly fails to provide information in such returns and held any foreign assets or foreign income at any time during the previous year shall be punished by rigorous imprisonment for a term that shall not be less than 6 months but may be extended to 7 years, along with a fine.
According to Section 51, anybody who willfully seeks to avoid paying any taxes, penalties, or interest that are owed or imposed by this Act would be subject to severe imprisonment for a time that must not be less than 3 years and may not exceed 10 years, as well as a fine. The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (“PMLA”) measures may also be activated if Section 51 becomes applicable.
According to Section 51(2), if a person willfully seeks to avoid paying tax, interest, or a penalty, they will be subject to a fine and a period of imprisonment with a minimum of three months and a maximum of three years in jail.
According to Section 51(3), a willful effort includes any situation in which a person: possesses in his custody or control books of account or any document containing a false entry or statement relevant to any proceedings. Makes a false entry or statement in these books of accounts or other papers or causes one to be created. Willfully leaves out, or causes to be left out, any pertinent item or declaration in the books or document. Make any other conditions exist that would allow that person to avoid paying any taxes, penalties, or interest that are due or imposed under this Act.
According to Section 52, anyone who delivers an account or statement that is false and knows it is false or does not believe it to be true will be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term that must not be less than 6 months but can exceed 7 years, as well as a fine.
According to Section 53, anyone who aids or abets another person in making or delivering a false account or statement that person knows is false or does not believe to be true will be punished with fine and rigorous imprisonment for a term that cannot be less than 6 months but may reach 7 years.
According to Section 56, if a company commits an offense, everyone who was in charge of and accountable to the company for the conduct of business at the time the offense was committed is deemed guilty of the offense and is subject to punishment in accordance with the law. The term “company” includes both HUF and unincorporated entities. All adult members of HUF are regarded as directors and are accountable as such. All partners in a company are regarded as directors and are thus liable.
According to Section 58, a second offence attracts a minimum prison sentence of 3 years, a maximum of 10 years, and a fine ranging from Rs 5 lakh to Rs 1 crore. Additionally, it states that the PMLA, 2002 will now consider deliberate attempts to evade tax, interest, or penalty to be a crime.
According to Section 72, any asset that was acquired or made before the start of this Act and for which no declaration has been made shall be deemed to have been acquired or made in the year in which the Assessing Officer issues a notice under Section 10 and shall be subject to the provisions of this Act. However, the deeming provisions of section 72(c) would not apply when determining the person’s residency status; instead, the actual year in which the undisclosed asset was acquired would be taken into account. For the purposes of this Act, the JCIT/Addl CIT are the approved AOs.
The Government of India has made a crucial step to stop the flow of black money both inside and outside the nation by passing the Black Money Act. The Act establishes a mechanism for reporting undisclosed income and assets and their subsequent taxes, as well as a framework to identify and prosecuting those with undisclosed foreign income and assets. Further supporting the government’s initiatives to encourage accountability and transparency in the Indian economy are the Act’s provisions for appeals, revisions, and penalties, which include harsh penalties for willful attempts to evade paying taxes, penalties, or interest. Overall, the Black Money Act is a crucial weapon in the government’s fight against black money and its adverse impact on the growth and development of the country’s economic system.
Read our Article: Overview of the Black Money Act, 2015
Kiran is a multi-talented individual currently pursuing her final year of BBALLB at Chandigarh University. In addition to her studies, Kiran is also a dedicated legal content writer and researcher. She has a keen interest in the legal writing and is committed to using her knowledge and skills to produce informative and insightful content.
Black money has been the subject of heated political debate in India for a long time. Successiv...
The Apex Court pronounced a judgement in the case titled Tata Motors Vs The Brihan Mumbai Elect...
Since economies are moving towards digitalisation and making it feasible to conduct transaction...
The Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) Pro-rata and Pari-Passu Rights Proposal Consultation Pa...
The Financial Action Task Force, i.e. FATF (the Force), is the global money laundering and terr...
Advance tax refers to the payment of the tax liability before the end of the relevant financia...
On 11.12.15, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court (HC) pronounced a landmark judgement in the case ti...
Money laundering can be defined as the process of illegal concealment of the origin of money ob...
Every assessee in India is obligated to file an income tax return and make the timely payment o...
In the recent past, India has seen burgeoning demand for internet and smartphones. The rapid ri...
Are you human?: 7 + 7 =
Easy Payment Options Available No Spam. No Sharing. 100% Confidentiality
In the case of Anirudh Kamal Shukla v. Union of India, the Allahabad High Court ruled that for money-launderers Jai...
07 Apr, 2022
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) was established in the year 1956, with its headquarters in New Delhi. It works und...
20 Apr, 2022
Red Herring Top 100 Asia enlists outstanding entrepreneurs and promising companies. It selects the award winners from approximately 2000 privately financed companies each year in the Asia. Since 1996, Red Herring has kept tabs on these up-and-comers. Red Herring editors were among the first to recognize that companies such as Google, Facebook, Kakao, Alibaba, Twitter, Rakuten, Salesforce.com, Xiaomi and YouTube would change the way we live and work.
Researchers have found out that organization using new technologies in their accounting and tax have better productivity as compared to those using the traditional methods. Complying with the recent technological trends in the accounting industry, Enterslice was formed to focus on the emerging start up companies and bring innovation in their traditional Chartered Accountants & Legal profession services, disrupt traditional Chartered Accountants practice mechanism & Lawyers.
Stay updated with all the latest legal updates. Just enter your email address and subscribe for free!
Chat on Whatsapp
Hey I'm Suman. Let's Talk!