SP Services
Taxation

A Complete Analysis on International Double Taxation

International Double Taxation

Every country has a sovereign right to determine its domestic tax policy. A country also has the exclusive right to tax anyone and anything within its fiscal borders. However, in this age of globalization, the transactions involve two separate jurisdictions. Such cross-border transactions raise questions such as: who should be taxed, what should be taxed and in which jurisdiction should it be taxed. These questions are key considerations in the field of international taxation. Further, a country cannot impose its tax laws on another country as both are sovereign. There is but no single international tax law that governs the taxation of cross-border/ international transactions. The overlapping of laws of different jurisdictions may give rise to international double taxation which is an unintended result of a disparity in tax legislation.

International Double Taxation arises when domestic rules are applied to cross-border transactions. One of the major objectives of international tax principles is to make sure that income is not taxed twice. Double Taxation impedes international trade and investment therefore, a significant aim of international law principle is to prevent and eliminate double taxation. Prevention and elimination of double taxation are mainly done in two ways either by i) granting double taxation relief or ii) allocating taxing rights via tax treaties. Granting double taxation relief can be done either unilaterally by the domestic/resident country or bilaterally via tax treaties. The unilateral measure means incorporating provisions on preventing double taxation in domestic tax laws. The bilateral tax treaties entered into between countries for double tax avoidance are known as Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs).

Worldwide and domestic tax systems – International Double Taxation

Every country has a sovereign right to design its tax system. At an international level, it gives rise to a variety of systems with no two tax systems being alike. The disparity gives rise to conflicts. It is the disparity that encouraged many states to adopt a common approach to imposing tax liability. The common approach includes the following:

  1. Worldwide taxation – It is imposed by the resident state on the worldwide income of a resident.
  2. Territorial taxation – It is imposed by the source state on the income or capital arising in a state.

Countries using the residence or citizenship rule generally adopt the worldwide basis for taxation and levy tax on the global income of their residents regardless of the origin of income. Whereas countries using the territorial tax system, levy tax only on domestically sourced income regardless of the residential status of the recipient. In practical implementation, a mixture of both systems is adopted. Under the worldwide tax system, only the residents of the state will be taxed and non-residents will not be taxed even if the income arises in that country. However, some countries also tax non-residents on their income arising within the country. Now countries that follow the worldwide taxation system have also begun to include aspects of a territorial system in their domestic tax system. Similarly, countries following territorial tax systems may tax foreign income if it is remitted into the country or consider certain foreign income to be sourced domestically thereby not restricting the taxing rights only to domestically sourced income. Despite following a common approach, it is inevitable to avoid the incidence of double taxation and conflicts arising out of such differences. Incidence of double taxation can be of the following types:

  1. Juridical Double Taxation
    Under this type of double taxation, a taxpayer is taxed twice on the same item of income or capital. The incidence of double taxation generally arises when two or more jurisdiction levy tax on the same income or capital of the same taxpayer. In International transactions, such instances take place as a result of overlapping taxing rights on the same income or capital.
    • Source-source conflict
      Where the income or the conflict is deemed to have been sourced in two or more countries and two or more countries treat the taxable income or capital as being sourced in each of their respective countries. Such a conflict is called the source-source conflict. In such situations, if there is no provision for relief then the taxpayer would be subjected to tax to the fullest extent of each country’s laws.
    • Residence-residence conflict
      Under this type of conflict, the taxpayer qualifies as a resident of two or more jurisdictions. This can be an outcome of different tests used by different jurisdictions to determine residence under domestic law. If both jurisdictions tax[1] their residents on worldwide income, then the taxpayer will be liable to tax in both countries. The tax treaties generally provide a way out of such a deadlock but the domestic laws might as well deal with it.
    • Source-residence conflict
      Under this type of conflict, the taxing rights of different countries overlap. In this, the taxpayer is a resident of a country that follows the residence rule for taxation and he has income or capital which is sourced in another country following territorial or source-based taxation. Usually, the domestic/resident country provides relief from double taxation arising under this type of conflict. Apart from this, even treaty relief is available to resolve the conflict of double taxation.
  2. Economic Double Taxation
    This type of double taxation occurs when the same income or capital is taxed in the hands of two different taxpayers. An example of such a type of double taxation is dividend payment by a company. Dividends are first paid out of taxed profits of a company and are taxed again after distribution to the company’s shareholders. Another instance of economic double taxation can be where tax authorities of a country make transfer pricing adjustments to cross-border intra-group transactions but no collateral adjustment is made or allowed by other country’s tax authorities. Usually, the resident countries provide relief for economic double taxation and apart from a few narrow exceptions, tax treaties do not provide relief for economic double taxation.

Conclusion

International businesses frequently face the issue of double taxation where their income is taxed in the country where it is treated as an income for tax purposes both in a foreign country as well as in the domestic country. International double taxation discourages international trade as it makes international business or international transactions expensive to pursue. Every country at present date wants to open its economy for foreign business and trade. So to avoid instances of international double taxation, countries enter into tax treaties known as DTAAs. These treaties are often based on models provided by the OECD. In these treaties, the signatory countries agree to limit the taxation of international business either by exempting tax or by providing relief. This measure helps facilitate trade between the countries to avoid double taxation.

Also Read:
How Does International Taxation Operate?
The Principles of International Tax Planning
Tax Treaties and their role in International Taxation

Ankita Tiwari

Ankita is an Advocate and has joined Enterslice as a Legal Researcher. Her work focuses on General Civil and Commercial laws, Corporate Taxation Laws, Labour and Employment Laws and Dispute Resolution. She is a law graduate from School of Law, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies. Prior to joining Enterslice, Ankita has the experience of practicing law in Delhi and Odisha.

Business Plan Consultant

Trending Posted

Startup CFO

Our Awards Our Awards

Top 100 Companies in Asia - Red Herring
Top 100 Companies in Asia - Red Herring

Red Herring Top 100 Asia enlists outstanding entrepreneurs and promising companies. It selects the award winners from approximately 2000 privately financed companies each year in the Asia. Since 1996, Red Herring has kept tabs on these up-and-comers. Red Herring editors were among the first to recognize that companies such as Google, Facebook, Kakao, Alibaba, Twitter, Rakuten, Salesforce.com, Xiaomi and YouTube would change the way we live and work.

Top 25 in India - Consultants Review

Researchers have found out that organization using new technologies in their accounting and tax have better productivity as compared to those using the traditional methods. Complying with the recent technological trends in the accounting industry, Enterslice was formed to focus on the emerging start up companies and bring innovation in their traditional Chartered Accountants & Legal profession services, disrupt traditional Chartered Accountants practice mechanism & Lawyers.

Top 25 in India - Consultants Review

In the news