Advisory Services
Audit
Consulting
ESG Advisory
RBI Registration
SEBI Registration
IRDA Registration
FEMA Advisory
Compliances
IBC Services
VCFO Services
Growing
Developing
ME-1
ME-2
EU-1
EU-2
SE
Others
Select Your Location
Indirect taxes play a significant role in the Indian economy, with businesses collecting them from consumers and paying the same to Government. However, the collection and payment of indirect taxes can often lead to disputes between businesses and the government. These disputes can arise due to various reasons, such as the interpretation of tax laws, the classification of goods and services, and the calculation of tax liabilities. Resolving these disputes can be a time-consuming and costly process for businesses. The courts in India have played a crucial role in settling indirect tax disputes, with several landmark decisions providing guidance and clarity on the taxation of goods and services. In this blog, we will explore the common types of indirect tax disputes faced by businesses in India, the role of courts in resolving these disputes, and the impact of court decisions on businesses.
GST is a comprehensive indirect tax that was introduced in India in 2017, replacing multiple indirect taxes like VAT, Excise Duty, Sales Tax and Service Tax. GST is levied on the supply of goods and services and is collected by businesses registered under GST. It is a destination-based tax, which means that it is levied at the point of consumption rather than at the point of origin. The tax rate varies depending on the type of goods or services supplied.
Excise duty is a tax levied on the manufacture or production of goods in India. It is typically paid by manufacturers and producers and is included in the price of the goods. Excise duty is levied on a wide range of goods, including tobacco, petroleum products, and alcoholic beverages. Excise duty rates can vary based on the type of goods and are typically revised in the annual budget.
Customs duty is a tax levied on the import and export of goods in India. It is collected by the customs department and is typically paid by importers or exporters. Customs duty rates can vary based on the type of goods and are typically revised in the annual budget. Customs duty is levied to protect domestic industries from foreign competition and to generate revenue for the government.
Service tax was a tax levied on the provision of services in India. It was typically paid by service providers and was included in the price of the services. Service tax was levied on a wide range of services, including telecommunications, transportation, and hospitality services. Service tax rates varied based on the type of services and were typically revised in the annual budget.
Indirect tax disputes are a common occurrence in India, with businesses facing disputes over various aspects of indirect taxes. Here are some common disputes faced by businesses for each of the primary types of indirect taxes:
a. GST Disputes:
b. Excise Duty Disputes:
c. Customs Duty Disputes:
d. Service Tax Disputes:
The role of courts in resolving indirect tax disputes is crucial in India, as businesses often face disputes related to various aspects of indirect taxes. Here are some ways in which courts play a role in resolving indirect tax disputes:
Several landmark court decisions related to indirect tax disputes have been made in India. Here are some of the significant court decisions related to indirect tax disputes:
a. Balaji Theatre v. Chief Secretary [2020] (Madras) In this case, the Madras High Court held that the municipality’s levy of entertainment tax on cinema theatres was constitutional and valid under the GST regime. The petitioner, a cinema theatre owner, had challenged the municipality’s order to pay entertainment tax after the introduction of GST. The petitioner argued that admission to cinema halls is treated as a supply of service chargeable to GST under the GST legislation. The municipality could not collect a separate entertainment tax. However, the court observed that the Puducherry Municipalities Act, 1973, was still in force and empowered the municipal council to impose a tax on entertainment. The court held that unless the introduction of the PGST Act repealed the act, the municipality could collect entertainment tax.
b. Smt. Kanishka Matta v. Union of India [2020] (Madhya Pradesh): In this case, the Madhya Pradesh High Court held that GST authorities had the power to seize cash from an assessee under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act[1]. The petitioner was the wife of the proprietor of a firm involved in confectionery and pan masala items. The department had conducted a search operation and seized cash of around Rs. 66 lakhs. The petitioner argued that the department needed to be more competent in seizing cash since it could not be treated as a document, book, or thing under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act. However, the court held that the word “thing” needed to be interpreted widely and would include money as well. Therefore, the department had rightly seized the cash, and the question of releasing the amount only arose once the investigation was completed.
c. Skill Lotto Solutions (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India [2020]: In this case, the Supreme Court held that the levy of GST on lotteries was neither discriminatory nor violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 301, and 304 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner, an authorized agent for the sale and distribution of lotteries organized by the State of Punjab, had filed a writ petition challenging the definition of goods under Section 2(52) of the CGST Act 2017, and the notification levying tax on lotteries. The court observed that including an actionable claim in the definition of goods under the CGST Act was not contrary to the legal meaning of goods. Therefore, the court held that the levy of GST on lotteries was constitutional and valid.
The impact of court decisions related to indirect tax disputes on businesses in India can be far-reaching. Here are some of the ways in which court decisions can impact businesses,
In conclusion, indirect tax disputes can be a major challenge for businesses in India, leading to prolonged litigation, uncertainty, and financial losses. However, court decisions can play a crucial role in resolving these disputes, providing clarity on laws and regulations, setting precedents, and creating a more stable and predictable tax environment for businesses. The landmark court decisions related to indirect tax disputes discussed in this article have had far-reaching implications for businesses in India, impacting their tax liabilities, compliance requirements, and reputation. By understanding the role of courts in resolving indirect tax disputes and the impact of court decisions on their operations, businesses can make informed decisions about their tax strategy and operations, enabling them to navigate the complex and ever-changing tax landscape in India.
Also Read: Corporate Tax in India: Everything you need to know
Kiran is a multi-talented individual currently pursuing her final year of BBALLB at Chandigarh University. In addition to her studies, Kiran is also a dedicated legal content writer and researcher. She has a keen interest in the legal writing and is committed to using her knowledge and skills to produce informative and insightful content.
On 18th May 2023, the Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) released a Consultation Paper o...
Infrastructure and real estate have been regarded as India's "sunshine sector" since the turn o...
On 22nd May 2023, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT)[1] issued a new circular under secti...
Anyone can have different sources of income. With globalization and the opening up of economies...
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is crucial in regulating NBFC, including branch openings and cl...
In India, Non-Banking Financial Companies are subject to certain restrictions from taking publi...
It's usually a good idea to diversify the assets in your financial portfolio, especially during...
A nation is being built by the non-banking finance company through the development of wealth, t...
A corporate entity known as a portfolio manager complies with a contract or agreement with the...
Identifying and analysing risks associated with individual portfolio investments, such as equit...
Are you human?: 3 + 2 =
Easy Payment Options Available No Spam. No Sharing. 100% Confidentiality
The penalties are incurred due to the default of the taxpayer. There are many activities that can further attract t...
07 Nov, 2020
In India, gifts are often exchanged between close knitted families and known acquaintances which acts as a symbol o...
17 Jan, 2020
Red Herring Top 100 Asia enlists outstanding entrepreneurs and promising companies. It selects the award winners from approximately 2000 privately financed companies each year in the Asia. Since 1996, Red Herring has kept tabs on these up-and-comers. Red Herring editors were among the first to recognize that companies such as Google, Facebook, Kakao, Alibaba, Twitter, Rakuten, Salesforce.com, Xiaomi and YouTube would change the way we live and work.
Researchers have found out that organization using new technologies in their accounting and tax have better productivity as compared to those using the traditional methods. Complying with the recent technological trends in the accounting industry, Enterslice was formed to focus on the emerging start up companies and bring innovation in their traditional Chartered Accountants & Legal profession services, disrupt traditional Chartered Accountants practice mechanism & Lawyers.
Stay updated with all the latest legal updates. Just enter your email address and subscribe for free!
Chat on Whatsapp
Hey I'm Suman. Let's Talk!