Advisory Services
Audit
Consulting
ESG Advisory
RBI Registration
SEBI Registration
IRDA Registration
FEMA Advisory
Compliances
IBC Services
VCFO Services
Growing
Developing
ME-1
ME-2
EU-1
EU-2
SE
Others
Select Your Location
The most critical stage for a business is the time before its commencement. Prior to the commencement of business the question which troubles the Revenue Authorities the most is related to the Tax implication of Income and Expenditure during that period. Revenue Authorities consider the expenditure as capital in nature and income as revenue in nature whereas on the other hand assesses wish to treat the same in exactly the opposite manner. In this blog, an attempt has been made to remove the confusion and uncertainty regarding this issue and provide a clear and better understanding of this entire problem by analyzing all significant and prominent legal precedents in this regard.
Before the commencement of business, there is a large expenditure of funds. All this expenditure which is incurred by business enterprises and start-ups during the initial years of incorporation is considered as pre-operative expenses or expenditure incurred before the commencement of business by the Revenue Authorities. Revenue Authorities consider this expenditure as ‘capital’ in nature to be debited to the “Capital Work In progress” account, till the production of actual business commences and gets proportionately amortized in subsequent years.
This is a well-defined law that any expenditure incurred before the commencement of business is a capital expenditure. Further, it needs to be noted that for any expenditure to be claimed as tax-deductible revenue expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act[1], it is required that such expenditure should have incurred exclusively for business purposes, and it should be revenue in nature.
The natural belief of the Revenue Authorities revolves around the fact that “when the business has not commenced, how can there be any question of claiming any tax-deductible business expenditure by the assessee?”
As per Revenue Authorities, a business is said to be commenced in manufacturing companies, when the commercial production begins whereas, in the case of trading companies, the execution of the first trading order marks the commencement of business.
However, this simple explanation by Revenue Authorities is not that simple for business enterprises and start-ups. The entire expenditure incurred by these business enterprises and startups during their initial years of incorporation is denied to be claimed as lawful business expenditure until the actual business has not begun or commercial business has not commenced.
Here we need to understand the difference between ‘commencement’ and ‘setting-up’ of business. Both these terms are not synonymous with each other. The business is said to be “set-up’ when it is ready to be commenced however, the commencement of business is in no relation with setting up of business. There can be a gap between setting-up and commencement of business.
So, the tax implications for ‘expenditure’ incurred before the commencement of business can be understood as explained by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court. As per the Court, the cut-off point for considering the expenditure as tax-deductible revenue expenditure is ‘setting-up of business’ and not the ‘commencement of business’. Therefore, to take advantage of allowable tax deduction business owners need to understand the clear difference between ‘setting-up’ and ‘commencement’ of business.
As per the criteria and tests laid out by the Hon’ble High Courts following are the activities constituting the ‘setting-up of business’ of an enterprise:
Now when all these activities are done, and the business has been set-up by the enterprise as per the guidelines of various Hon’ble High Courts, the expenditure incurred by these enterprises after the ‘setting up’ of their business is considered as tax-deductible revenue expenditure. This expenditure incurred ought to be considered as a tax-deductible expenditure even if it has been incurred before the commencement of business or commercial production.
Revenue Authorities consider the expenditure incurred by business enterprises and start-ups before the commencement of business as capital in nature. After this one would be inclined to believe in the thought that the Authorities will consider the income earned in this period to be also of capital in nature.
However, Revenue Authorities are not so consistent after all. Opposite to their consideration of expenditure pertaining to the period before the commencement of business, as a capital expenditure, the Revenue Authorities tend to treat the interest or any other income generated during this period as revenue in nature.
Although, as per the subsequent judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the Hon’ble High Courts, if the income is earned whether, by the way of interest or any other funds which were used to set up the plant for business purpose, it should be capitalized and set-off against preoperative expenses.
The above-discussed propositions related to the tax implications of expenditure and income of the period before the commencement of business or commercial production can be summarized down to the following points:
Also, Read: Section 40(A) 2: Disallowances of Expenses to Specified Person.
A passionate legal content writer, a nature enthusiast, an avid reader, and a part-time thinker. By means of conducting in-depth research on industry related topics, Shubham often builds flawless and intelligible legal content for populace from all walks of life.
On 18th May 2023, the Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) released a Consultation Paper o...
Infrastructure and real estate have been regarded as India's "sunshine sector" since the turn o...
On 22nd May 2023, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT)[1] issued a new circular under secti...
Anyone can have different sources of income. With globalization and the opening up of economies...
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is crucial in regulating NBFC, including branch openings and cl...
In India, Non-Banking Financial Companies are subject to certain restrictions from taking publi...
It's usually a good idea to diversify the assets in your financial portfolio, especially during...
A nation is being built by the non-banking finance company through the development of wealth, t...
A corporate entity known as a portfolio manager complies with a contract or agreement with the...
Identifying and analysing risks associated with individual portfolio investments, such as equit...
Are you human?: 7 + 1 =
Easy Payment Options Available No Spam. No Sharing. 100% Confidentiality
The dividend distribution tax has been proposed to be removed, and it will no longer be charged at the level of com...
12 Feb, 2020
The Delhi High Court, in the case of Bharat Aluminium Company Limited v Union of India and Ors, ruled that an asses...
21 Jan, 2022
Red Herring Top 100 Asia enlists outstanding entrepreneurs and promising companies. It selects the award winners from approximately 2000 privately financed companies each year in the Asia. Since 1996, Red Herring has kept tabs on these up-and-comers. Red Herring editors were among the first to recognize that companies such as Google, Facebook, Kakao, Alibaba, Twitter, Rakuten, Salesforce.com, Xiaomi and YouTube would change the way we live and work.
Researchers have found out that organization using new technologies in their accounting and tax have better productivity as compared to those using the traditional methods. Complying with the recent technological trends in the accounting industry, Enterslice was formed to focus on the emerging start up companies and bring innovation in their traditional Chartered Accountants & Legal profession services, disrupt traditional Chartered Accountants practice mechanism & Lawyers.
Stay updated with all the latest legal updates. Just enter your email address and subscribe for free!
Chat on Whatsapp
Hey I'm Suman. Let's Talk!