{"id":13962,"date":"2019-02-25T17:54:29","date_gmt":"2019-02-25T12:24:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/enterslice.com\/learning\/?p=13962"},"modified":"2023-06-24T22:44:16","modified_gmt":"2023-06-24T17:14:16","slug":"restoration-nbfc-license","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/enterslice.com\/learning\/restoration-nbfc-license\/","title":{"rendered":"Recent Judgment of Madras High Court on Restoration of NBFC License Cancelled Due to Insufficient Net Owned Fund"},"content":{"rendered":"

On 29<\/strong>th<\/strong><\/sup> January 2019<\/strong>, Madras High Court gave relief to more than two thousand NBFCs whose licenses had been cancelled due to non-fulfilment of the Net Owned Fund requirement of Rs. 2 Crore. Now, they can apply for the restoration of their NBFC<\/a> license. In India, the Reserve Bank of India is empowered to cancel the NBFC license as per the Reserve Bank of India Act. In this article, we are going to discuss the order of the Madras High Court on reinstating the NBFC license, which was cancelled by the RBI due to non-fulfilment of the Net Owned Fund requirement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

An Opportunity for Restoration of NBFC License <\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Madras High Court has provided a chance to bring back the NBFC license, which was cancelled due to insufficient Net Owned Fund (NOF). The Reserve Bank of India is empowered to regulate the activities of NBFCs in India. As per Section 45-IA of the RBI Act<\/strong>[1]<\/strong><\/a><\/sup>, it is mandatory for NBFCs to obtain a Certificate of Registration (CoR) from the Reserve Bank of India before starting its operations; along with this, it is also mandatory for NBFCs to meet the Net Owned Fund (NOF) requirement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Previous Scenario <\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Previously, it was required for NBFCs to maintain a minimum Net Owned Fund of Rs. 25 lakhs. Therefore to meet the net owned fund requirement of Rs.25 lakhs, three years time period had been provided under section 45-IA of the RBI Act. During this period, NBFCs were allowed to carry out NBFC business activities irrespective of the fact they were not meeting the conditions prescribed for NBFC Registration<\/strong><\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Furthermore, this period of 3 years to maintain the Net Owned Fund may be further extended to 3 more years which should not exceed 6 years in aggregate, but this could only be done after considering the reason in writing. Further extension of time to NBFCs is a complete discretion of RBI in order to meet the Net Owned Fund requirement in addition to the three years provided by the law itself. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

NBFC License Cancellation Authority <\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In case NBFC fails to comply with the Net Owned Fund requirement, the Reserve Bank of India is empowered to cancel the NBFC license. On 27th March 2015, the RBI issued a notification regarding the maintenance of a minimum net owned fund of Rs. 2 Crore in order to carry out the business activities. For this purpose, the time to raise Net owned Fund has been extended till 1st<\/sup> April 2016 for up to Rs. 1 crore and 1st<\/sup> April 2017 for up to Rs. 2 crore. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"NBFC<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Relief by Madras High Court<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

On 29th<\/sup> January 2019, Madras High Court passed an order to provide relief to those NBFCs whose NBFC license had been cancelled due to insufficient Net Owned Fund. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>

In case of the below mentioned:\n\n\n\n

(Petitioners)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

M\/s. Nahar Finance and Leasing Limited<\/p>\n\n\n\n

M\/s. Lodha Finance India Limited<\/p>\n\n\n\n

M\/s. Valluvar Development Finance Pvt. Ltd.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

M\/s. Senthil Finance Private Limited<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Vs. (Respondents)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The General Manager, Reserve Bank of India<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Assistant General Manager, Reserve Bank of India<\/p><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Case Study <\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In this case, petitioners are NBFCs, and respondents had cancelled their Certificate of Registration (CoR) because petitioners had not complied with the Net Owned Fund requirement of Rs. 2 Crore. On this, petitioners claimed that the “order was passed without giving an opportunity of being heard”; therefore, this order has violated the principle of natural justice. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Madras High Court clarified the procedure defined under Section 45-IA of the RBI Act along with this; it has also interpreted the alternative which may be given to NBFCs by the RBI for fulfilling the Net owned Fund requirement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The above-mentioned petitioners issued Show Cause Notice on April 23rd,<\/sup> 2018, in relation to the cancellation of their Certificate of Registration (CoR) which was cancelled due to non-compliance with the Net Owned Fund requirement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Show Cause Notice, the petitioner stated that due to changes in the economy and policies of the government, such as demonetization or GST implementation, NBFCs were struggling to recover. Therefore they asked for an extension of time to comply with the Net Owned Fund requirement till 31st March 2019. Even after that, RBI passed an order of cancellation of the NBFC license that we’re unable to comply with the Net Owned Fund requirement. In response, NBFCs filed a writ petition. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The High Court suppresses the RBI’s order of cancellation of the NBFC license on the basis<\/a> of the below-mentioned grounds:<\/p>\n\n\n\n